difference between c2d

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aimex64

    #1

    difference between c2d

    Is there a big difference between intel c2d e6400 and intel c2d e6700? why is e6700 better?
  • mills7777

    #2
    Re: difference between c2d

    dont no what cpu that is but it's most proberly only a tiny bit faster and way more exspensive

    Comment

    • Sir. MatDef
      Member
      • Sep 2005
      • 2899

      #3
      Re: difference between c2d

      The e6700 has a higher default clockspeed (2.66ghz, instead of 2.13), and double the l2 cache (4mb vs 2).

      Wrong section, btw.

      Originally posted by mills7777
      dont no what cpu that is but it's most proberly only a tiny bit faster and way more exspensive
      Then don't post.

      Comment

      • camper.
        Member
        • Dec 2006
        • 3459

        #4
        Re: difference between c2d

        It's the exact same core w/ half the cache locked and a lower multiplier. Yay for Intel... Why on Earth didn't they sell them all the same? Marketing I guess?

        Comment

        • aimex64

          #5
          Re: difference between c2d

          and im guessing the cache doesn't make a big difference?

          Comment

          • Sir. MatDef
            Member
            • Sep 2005
            • 2899

            #6
            Re: difference between c2d

            Originally posted by foreverthe1
            and im guessing the cache doesn't make a big difference?
            Only about 5-10% (it depends on the application). The 6700 will be faster at stock.

            Comment

            • aimex64

              #7
              Re: difference between c2d

              i guess i'll just go for the e6400. because i heard upgrading your precessor was pretty darn easy. That true?

              Comment

              • LuckySeven

                #8
                Re: difference between c2d

                As long as your board supports C2D upgrading is as easy as plugging in a processor can be. No need to re-install OS or anything, just plug it in. E6400 is a good choice, IMO 4mb isn't worth the extra because there's hardly any performance difference. And it's the same core anyway.

                Comment

                • Sir. MatDef
                  Member
                  • Sep 2005
                  • 2899

                  #9
                  Re: difference between c2d

                  Moved.

                  Comment

                  • imported_Wreck

                    #10
                    Re: difference between c2d

                    IMO there are only two choices as far as Core 2 duo's go. Get the E4300 or E6600 and overclock those babies.

                    Comment

                    • =98=
                      Member
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 10299

                      #11
                      Re: difference between c2d

                      Originally posted by Wreck
                      IMO there are only two choices as far as Core 2 duo's go. Get the E4300 or E6600 and overclock those babies.
                      Damn Skippy...

                      Comment

                      • imported_Mrt1989

                        #12
                        Re: difference between c2d

                        Also when clocking e6700 it would be alot easier because it can reach high speeds with few FSB. Not all boards can do 450+ FSB so it e6400 need better/ more expensive motherboard.

                        Comment

                        Working...