I-ram

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • margav

    #1

    I-ram

    Im thinking about buying i-ram rev 1.3. Though I am not near my pc (in another country) I want to know how much space does bf2 take ( and if possible the individual space of AF and SF).

    Will I-ram fasten load times and/or increase fps if I record with fraps?

    thx
  • mlkmnz

    #2
    Re: I-ram

    It appears to speed up load times but they dont mention FPS. I wouldnt have thought so personally, that comes down to graphics card primarily, the stuff like RAM and to a lesser extent CPU.

    Comment

    • UltrAdamSki

      #3
      Re: I-ram

      Originally posted by margav
      Im thinking about buying i-ram rev 1.3. Though I am not near my pc (in another country) I want to know how much space does bf2 take ( and if possible the individual space of AF and SF).

      Will I-ram fasten load times and/or increase fps if I record with fraps?

      thx
      to anser your question my bf2 folder is 3.73gb which inludes SF, AF, EF but i have 64 size version of a lot of maps, so yours may be less.

      my SF folder is 828mb, again including 64 size maps

      not sure on AF or EF as they are kinda intergrated within BF2

      have you seen the youtube video with i-ram booting up windows, insane!!

      it will speed up map load times tremendously and when you have to optimize video settings

      adam

      Comment

      • Heavy552 AWG

        #4
        Re: I-ram

        I will wait until I-ram is at least 8 Gig and a little better in cost.

        I do look forward to the almost instant load times. Too many servers are loading me last these days where I used to be first.

        Comment

        • margav

          #5
          Re: I-ram

          There is a version with 16 gigs available, and for the 5 inch bays, but they cost about 1 000 GBP (without ram) and they are for sata

          Comment

          • Heavy552 AWG

            #6
            Re: I-ram

            Originally posted by margav
            There is a version with 16 gigs available, and for the 5 inch bays, but they cost about 1 000 GBP (without ram) and they are for sata
            Attractive I think but the cost is not worth it yet. Imagine a IRam booting into windows like instantly and hard drives retired in favor of memory that does not have moving parts.

            If money was not an object I probably would have it on the machine in order to get faster loading on Bloatware 2

            Comment

            • margav

              #7
              Re: I-ram

              It installs windows xp in 2 mins instead of 40 usual hehe

              The GIGABYTE GC-RAMDISK i-RAM uses fast RAM modules to emulate a hard disk drive, an interesting approach to speeding up storage. Does Gigabyte's i-RAM deliver the blistering performance it promises? HEXUS investigates...

              Comment

              • mlkmnz

                #8
                Re: I-ram

                Wait a little while longer (next year) and hard drives will be hybrids with solid state memory built into them....

                Comment

                • Roger Smith
                  Member
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 1390

                  #9
                  Re: I-ram

                  Originally posted by mlkmnz
                  Wait a little while longer (next year) and hard drives will be hybrids with solid state memory built into them....
                  ive heard this is what we have really been waiting for.

                  Comment

                  • margav

                    #10
                    Re: I-ram

                    Nooo, you dont get it, they will have a bigger cache, much bigger, but you can not compare them to solid state storage.

                    Comment

                    • venny

                      #11
                      Re: I-ram

                      its way above my budget. and its overkill. its sure is fantastic. but its like using this to run bf2.
                      Maybe Nvidia's recent tough talk following the acquisition of ATI wasn't just talk. They're backing up those words with some serious graphics muscle: a unit called the Quadro Plex 1000 that can pump 80 billion pixels per second for pro graphics needs. Like, really pro graphics needs. Before we hurt ourselves trying to figure just exactly how many Marios that is, we'll run the rest of the specs by you. The Quadro Plex comes in a desktop (pictured) or 3U rackmount configuration, and is designed for working with 12-megapixel HD video, 3D graphics, scientific visualization, simulations and whatever else needs that type of GPU power. One node involves eight Quadro FX cards, jammed into two Plex 1000 systems and paired up via SLI, all of which is hosted by a 32-bit Intel or 64-bit AMD machine running Windows or Linux. All that juicy Quake II power (we keed! we keed!) can be yours starting at a mere $17,500, and should be available beginning next month.

                      Comment

                      • Roger Smith
                        Member
                        • Aug 2006
                        • 1390

                        #12
                        Re: I-ram

                        Originally posted by venny
                        its way above my budget. and its overkill. its sure is fantastic. but its like using this to run bf2.
                        http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/02/n...ixels-per-sec/
                        quatros are for workstations, they donte ven perform all that well in games man.

                        Originally posted by margav
                        Nooo, you dont get it, they will have a bigger cache, much bigger, but you can not compare them to solid state storage.
                        you cant compair the performance or the price, both huge!

                        Comment

                        Working...