MnWar Reviews Militia

[Zips]

hahnchen wrote..

If you genuinely thought that their review was a high quality piece of writing, then fine. Then fine, but CSNation shouldn't just be rewarding other websites exposure because of their perceived effort, but their quality.

The number of independent sites is quite staggering. If any of the others were to submit their review link to us, we'd be more than glad to post a news piece about it. More than likely, if multiple sites provided us with links to their review of the latest release, we'd do a "batch news" and include every review link in a list type format.



Either way, we have something special in store for you guys coming up.

[DarkViper311]

Mmm. I like special.

[ominousone]

ooooo, special is good!!!



I just personally find is very Amazing how everyone can bash a article, just because it doesn't match their opinion on something or because it's not al "this is 1337 and should be played by all"

Just because osmething points out mistakes and shows things that are wrong, doesn't make it a bad article. They were quite kind to point ou tthe good things about hte map too. so people just need to relax and take things for what they are.

[zeet]

ominousone wrote..

ooooo, special is good!!!



I just personally find is very Amazing how everyone can bash a article, just because it doesn't match their opinion on something or because it's not al "this is 1337 and should be played by all"

Just because osmething points out mistakes and shows things that are wrong, doesn't make it a bad article. They were quite kind to point ou tthe good things about hte map too. so people just need to relax and take things for what they are.

I find it amazing how a map review can turn into a parade of Source bashing based on someones personal feelings.