Nuke Analyzed

[CSN NewsBot]

GotFrag? introduces a series of articles, entitled "Map X-Ray", that break down maps utilized for competitive play by starting out with de_nuke. From chokepoints to plans of attack, this analysis on "a very large and complicated map" features it all.

Terrorists need to be very careful attacking the bombsites in nuke. A poorly thought-out rush can end in complete disaster. It is not uncommon to see a Counter-Terrorist who knows where to sit getting two, three, or even four kills in under a second, especially in the ramp room. There are two important things the terrorists can do to avoid getting slaughtered when going through choke points: they can create distractions, and they can use grenades.

Click here to read this fine analysis, or don't and pretend you are some kind of mutated offspring of HeatoN and Ksharp.

[ImPhayze]

This seems incredibly useless to me

[Zips]

What's the point of analyzing a map as old as this NOW of all times?

[Cmoney]

good. now convert it to source.

[Zips]

Cmoney wrote..

good. now convert it to source.

A few people already have. Nothing official, but this is the best looking one I've seen thus far:

http://www.nordlichtclan.de/

[HitmanCodename48]

ImPhayze wrote..

This seems incredibly useless to me

it is. i wish CSN would quit polluting their news page with useless crap like this. all the maps have had the hell analyzed out of them since they came out. we don't need to be told every time somebody analyzes shit AGAIN.

[feiyang]

me yells:

boooorrrrrrringggg....

[DchozN]

This seems incredibly useless to me

What's the point of analyzing a map as old as this NOW of all times?

Map X-Ray: de_nuke



Joe "joeker" Hoffend with some help from Patrick "Irch" Cole bring you an in-depth breakdown of de_nuke, this week's CAL match map.

As stated, Week 2 of CAL play is set on de_nuke. Therefore, GotFrag? has taken the liberty in providing an analysis of de_nuke.

it is. i wish CSN would quit polluting their news page with useless crap like this. all the maps have had the hell analyzed out of them since they came out. we don't need to be told every time somebody analyzes shit AGAIN.

me yells:

boooorrrrrrringggg....

Here is a dandy suggestion: Filter out news pieces relating to "maps & textures" in your user preferences.



Or you fine gentlemen can continue sharing your most insightful and intelligent responses to this dandy news piece such as "boooorrrrrrringggg...." and the like. Carry on.

[Zips]

Even the majority of the comments at GotFrag for that article are saying the article seems rather trite after so much time.



Many are even claiming it's already been posted before verbatim. There just isn't any point in analyzing the map again after it's been out for years now. This would be an interesting article, provided it came out in the days of CS1.3 or so.

[xlokix]

They should have done a tides map analysis for source.

[Zips]

xlokix wrote..

They should have done a tides map analysis for source.

See now, that would have been good. They should wait though until the bugs are ironed out of that map.

[HitmanCodename48]

i agree. in the mean time, CSN can quit posting about map analysis sites and let the CAL people who actually care look for them themselves.

[ph03nix(k)]

When i first saw the title of this news... i thought for just it moment that it had come out for source. Then i scrolled down and was like .... wow gg useless bullshit.

[DeFade]

Zips wrote..

A few people already have. Nothing official, but this is the best looking one I've seen thus far:

http://www.nordlichtclan.de/

that looks really good

[FatboyTim]

ph03nix(k) wrote..

When i first saw the title of this news... i thought for just it moment that it had come out for source. Then i scrolled down and was like .... wow gg useless bullshit.

Me too.