CS: Source Update

[Smurfzilla]

i havent played cs:source since it was released, dont think i want to after hearing all these lame bugs and exploits =/

[-AK-]

^ ok, but it's your loss :P

[Thortok2000]

I'd play CS:S if I could, but my comp runs CS 1.6 at about 25 FPS (usually less), it makes me want to throw up the thought of trying to shove CS:S into it.



I'll get a better comp before I get CS:S, and better comps cost more than games.

[Noleafclover199]

css runs better then cs 1.6 on my pc.....quite strange tho

[x7-Superman!]

how well will ultra low settings run on a GF4MX440 in a p4 1.8?

[{(COMMANDO})008]

Edited by [user="235656"] @ [time="1098565150"]

cs:s runs fasteron my pc then cs 1.6 more smoother to.

[entRo]

x7-Superman! wrote..

how well will ultra low settings run on a GF4MX440 in a p4 1.8?

I have that card and a 1300 AMD Athlon, on medium settings I get 50 FPS. Then again, my friend also has that card and has a 2500 AMD and he can barely move, usually around 10 FPS on medium.

[Thortok2000]

Well, my computer royally sucks:



P2, I think 400mHz

128 MB Ram



And the graphics card is ATI Radeon 9000 Pro, I believe, with 128 MB of it's own VRAM.



My laptop is a little better (it's broken now, I hope to get it fixed as a Christmas present from someone):



P3 1.13 GHz, 256 MB Ram

nVidia GeForce 2 (32MB VRAM).



My comp runs CS 1.6 at 1280x1024 at around 20-25 FPS, and my laptop runs it at 1600x1400 at around 25-30 FPS.

[Noleafclover199]

thats got to suck

[Grimbal]

did i post it first???

[Schnimph]

bevause people are so gay i get updates like this instead of new models/maps... bastards

[Mobius?]

You know what this means?



We can do denial of service attackes on all cracked users until they get the next patch!



Burninate in heck myg0t, azzor, and your love child!

[.b0w. Bushwacker]

op wrote..

Maybe you should fix your drivers. I dont have problems like that with the same card and a p4 2.6ghz, running at 1600x1200.



This update came with some CS:S and DOD:S content for me, and it didn't say unlocking HL2 files, just unlocking CS:S files

entRo wrote..

I have that card and a 1300 AMD Athlon, on medium settings I get 50 FPS. Then again, my friend also has that card and has a 2500 AMD and he can barely move, usually around 10 FPS on medium.

yes... we as men will always be able to make our brand new macho'ly uber power machines run like little old mac LC II's .. its a gift i tell ya!

[empyrean]

Interesting.

[KiGrind]

Edited by [user="229050"] @ [time="1098660382"]

magicalpoop wrote..

Wow one update.



Hey wheres this update?



"Optimized Source to run 225% better on all DX9 systems."

"Fixed FPS/CPU issues with various systems"



AMD 3000+ XP

512DDR RAM

9800PRO128MB



Medium Settings

Average 25-30 + 1second lock ups in gun fights.

gg.

Just goes to show you how much AMD sucks huh? I have Intel 2.6Ghz w/ HT, 512MB PC3200 Corsair RAM, and HIS Excailibur 9800 Pro



Avg. 60-120 FPS. Full Settings ( Without any filtering cause it hardly changes the look and it kills your FPS...)



ANYONE that is haveing a problume like this did the following:



A) Bought from DELL

-or-

B) Tried to build a $2000 gameing rig themselves with $800, went cheap on the motherboard, ram, case, and PSU, while never actually assembleing the thing correctly and it never running correctly.



Lets face it, 9800 is still good, but its lacking. I kinda laughed when i got mine about a year ago. FarCry on very high settings... yeah so what the game suck ball k. Oh well...