Gfx Comparison

[int3rnil]

Well, I think the whole idea was to compare CS to CS:S. CZ was just a small expansion.

[peagle]

nice painstaking comparison =)

[lythium666]

what kind of system do you need to run cs source, i have an old 850mhz amd

[PeteRoy]

Very disappointing, still tons of inaccuraties in the guns, the M4A1 looks all wrong, the pistols are all wrong.

[CabalSoljea]

ma_cherie wrote..

Finally, I have proof that the XM1014 in CS:S is totally different than the CS 1.6 version.



But, where's the CS:CZ to CS:S comparisons?

int3rnil wrote..

Well, I think the whole idea was to compare CS to CS:S. CZ was just a small expansion.

i guess the difference won't be that much comparing CS:S with CS:CZ...

[Maverick2K4]

Hate to be really really nit-picky, but does anyone notice that the hand/arm models in CS:S are bigger than the ones in 1.6?

[Nunka]

ma_cherie wrote..

But, where's the CS:CZ to CS:S comparisons?

Up the ass of anyone who even remotely enjoyed playing CZ, that's where.

PeteRoy wrote..

Very disappointing, still tons of inaccuraties in the guns, the M4A1 looks all wrong, the pistols are all wrong.

Nobody gives a fuck, because everything looks orgasmic anyway. Especially that Deagle... I doubt even the best modelers/skinners will be able to top that any time soon.

[Deletable_Man]

PeteRoy wrote..

Very disappointing, still tons of inaccuraties in the guns, the M4A1 looks all wrong, the pistols are all wrong.

YUO R GUN MASTUR!111!

[Supersonic^]

lol

[16:14] <@MikeJ> Very disappointing, still tons of inaccuraties in the guns, the M4A1 looks all wrong, the pistols are all wrong.



[16:14] <@MikeJ> this guy sure knows his stuff!

go MikeJ :x

[jo0ni3]

PeteRoy wrote..

Very disappointing, still tons of inaccuraties in the guns, the M4A1 looks all wrong, the pistols are all wrong.

what have you been playing lately???

definitely NOT CS! :P

[{Sose}]

Everything definetely looks much better, some of the rifles need to be cleaned up to look more accurate... but the scopes on the SG552 and the Scout look fugly.



The three guns that I believe don't look nice at all are the P90, UMP, and SG552.

[azz0r]

If your going to spawn in the middle of thin air and buy guns from an invisible shop he'll be damned if the guns arent real!

[Bokuho]

Anyone notice how they all look like bollocks?



Seriously. The P228 still doesn't look all that much like a P228. It's just a generic handgun. The Elites look like toys. The FiveseveN loks like it was carved out of a solid block of plastic. The Glock, USP, SMGs and rifles are all too stubby and fat, the Deagle is too small, the sniper rifles are at random scales, and in fact the only gun that looks even vaguely good is the bloody M249 PARA. I've seen custom models from two years or so ago that look better. FS.



Note to Valve:

Don't bother doing this yourselves, you evidently suck at it. Go hire Lonewolf, Djiesse, etc etc. Hell, just rent out all of CDG, get them to do the models for you. It'll look ten times better.

[azz0r]

You know what you guys should check out when you first get it unlocked?



At the cafe me and this guy were testing out throwing nades etc at other players, we noticed that flashbags hitting a player now cause 1hp damage, so to test the icons, I knocked him down to 98hp, then threw 2 flashbags at his body, it killed it. But they havent put in a small flashbag icon so a huge one appeared and pushed all the kill details about, well good

[Zips]

Firefucker wrote..

yeah, awesome pics.



looks like you used FSAA on the cs:s pictures, but not the 1.6 ones...true or not?

MikeJ can better answer this one.



But from my experiences playing CS1.6 with 8xSAA and 16xAF it still causes a lot of jaggies, despite that high amount of FSAA.