Title Fight

[CSN NewsBot]

Gamespy have recently hosted one of their Title Fight features between Counter-Strike and Rainbow Six 3. Voting is now closed, but if you're a member you can talk it over in their forums. If not, you can look at the article itself, which shows the results of the poll and some staff opinions on each of the games.



Guess which won?

[bullet_head]

RVS got owned by the community 8-)

[Julio Caesar]

Battle feild 1942 should of won over UT, UT is so overrated and the gameplay gets old after 5 minutes of playing the game.

[Fuzzio]

RVS is awesome when you play co-operative mode online (you fight AI players like svencoop), but adverserial (player versus player) is just lame.

[Wuulfe]

Battlefield 1942 shouldn't have won shit over UT.



Battlefield, while being a good game, doesn't have half the style of UT. UT = teh win.

[^.j()$h.^]

bullet_head wrote..

RVS got owned by the community 8-)

RBS*?

[Helkite]

I think RVS = ravenshield

[Julio Caesar]

Style? I'm sorry if the pretty grapics and the smoke effects amaze you in a way for you to say that the game has style, but that crap doesn't impress me one bit.

[^.j()$h.^]

Helkite wrote..

I think RVS = ravenshield

I thought he meant Rainbow Six but now that I look at it, he probably meant Ravenshield.

[Helkite]

Indeed.

[.b0w. Bushwacker]

Helkite wrote..

Indeed.

quite

[raging dragon]

no comparison HL/CS wins hands down

[Julio Caesar]

Cheerio.....? or cheers?

[QuickDraw]

RS while being a good game, never stood a chance against CS, honestly.

[xm8]

they're different types of first persion shooters and from that standpoint they can't be fairly compared [ rs vs cs ]. rs goes for realism and a true tactical shooter simulation while cs loses realism for arcade like game that's fun and fast-paced. apples and oranges.