CSTuner Beta Released

[Jsunu]

Hrm if there is one thing that is what is said.. It is

[zimzap]

Paying 19 bucks for a game that was free or you payed 30 for ...

[Jsunu]

Ya thats like paying a hooker instead of doing it yourself... there is not point

[Darkhorse]

One day, we'll have software that installs my pens1 into a female.



That day however, haveth yet to come.

[SinaC]

Edited by [user="2964"] @ [time="1026019457"]

Darkhorse wrote..

One day, we'll have software that installs my pens1 into a female.



That day however, haveth yet to come.

http://cosmicfire.net/~david/lightning.jpg

[Darkhorse]

eh?

[Andeh]

bleh, mediocre. Model is dated as is the skin, theres much better in the archives, my score might be higher if the smoothing was a tad better than what it is, even thought its not too bad. glad you kept the other arm skins in the zip too cuz those one suck and they are not aligned properly (fingers)

[Mr. T]

tin soldiers m4 sucked before this reskin... it still sucks

[bullet_head]

I'm taking sides with mr.t on this one, it sucks.

[gumplunger]

I think this skin is worse than the one on the original release. Different brightnesses and highlights and tones of black all across the body, not to mention the grip looks horrifying. I really can't find what's to like about this one.

[perrypan]

Edited by [user="142452"] @ [time="1080894305"]

I really love Tin's M4 (as everybody knows ), but I also know it has been old. Ultimate M4, Snark's both have more detail and better looking skin. I have to admit Tin's M4 is not the best choice like old days anymore. However, this is still one of the best M4 availible. I personally found the reskin is ok, not really makes this M4 any better.

I also notice that people in CSN team have such different tastes in weapon models. One giving it 9/10, the other three give it 5 and 6. This is a huge difference. 9 means it is superior, and 5 or 6 means it is a junk.(rating Tin's M4 5 or 6 still a bit too strict?) CSN people may need to gather up and find out a more consistant and fair way to rate models.

[stevomanevo]

Doesn't look bad, judging by the picture, but i perfer my UlTiMaTe M4a1 better!

Hmmm.... if it was possible i think counter-strike 1.7 should have player profiles and within those profiles you should be able to view models and skins as the player does... and maybe rankings like wc3 tft where you gain levels as your rank goes up (only levels don't do much but be useful with wtj picking teams)

[Hockeyplayr1]

yuk, that skin sucks. The models' still a h00t but this reskin is pretty damn sorry.

[-:Nighthawk:-]

Beautiful model. The skin for the weapon itself looks pretty decent, albeit really a bit too dark for my personal preference. (Yes, you all know I have a fetish for Tin Soldier's Colt M4A1 Reissue.)



Anyway, the arm textures are a disappointment in both cases. The originals aren't fantastic, but they are aligned fairly well. The new arm textures are misaligned (look at the fingernails, for instance) but that's not the part that bugs me. What does is that the source texture is really messed up. It looks like it has been sized down to about a quarter of its original size, and then pixel resized back up some again. The end result is a lot of really horrible blocky lines streaking through your arms. Same thing happened to the thumb texture, but not so noticeably (since it's smaller).



Overall, it's a solid replacement with a few drawbacks that may or may not keep you from using it. Looks absolutely killer in the hands of others, though.

[dadozer]

Excellent model, bad skin.... I'm not a fan of these origins either, but that is just me.



I like how the person who made that screenshot didn't spend hours making a mock-up model screenshot - everyone can see what the model looks like without having to downloading. (BTW, I did download this :P)