Rifles and their physics

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jsunu

    #61
    Agreed^

    Comment

    • -:Nighthawk:-

      #62
      Yes, CS-World is ran by a 12 year old, and while I know plenty of 12 year olds who could put together a better site... most of them aren't doing it, so I'll give this kid that much credit. Beyond that, however, it ends, because in my opinion, if you're going to put something on the web and request others read it, you had better make sure it's not a pile of crap. "Yeah, you guys want to come over to my place and wade through a pile of crap? I'm 12, so you can excuse me for not providing better for you..." Age is a poor excuse. If you're going to say it's because of your age, well, then quit maintaining a site until you're old enough to do a little quality control.



      As for the stereotype that 14-year-olds are the lamers in the CS community... well, I've got mixed opinions on that one. Yeah, while not everyone who is that age is completely immature, there are plenty who are, and that impression is going to outweigh the good one, you just know. However... at college there were a couple of guys who were just as immature as your stereotypical 14-year-olds, so maturity doesn't always reflect age.



      And finally, the issue about silencers and all that stuff. First off, yeah, everything asspennies said was exactly right, as far as CS goes. If you want to argue about what silencers do in real life, you'll find that your gun is less accurate (even though it has a longer "barrel", and will lose power. Unless the gun has an integral silencer (eg, MP5SD), accuracy will be lower, for various reasons I don't feel like going into right now). However, in real life, recoil will be a bit less, though it takes a little longer to swing your gun around and aim with a heavy silencer on the end of it. If the CS team wanted to emmulate this, the gun would shoot -less- accurately, and the crosshairs would both expand and shink more slowly while silenced. But they don't, so get used to it.



      As far as reduced power, though, it's typically about 2-3 hitpoints per bullet less with silencer, I've found through testing. (Unfortunately, there is no single "this gun does this much damage per bullet in this hit zone... it's damage within a range, not absolute.)



      That's it for now. I stay firm with my support for asspennies posting this... funny stuff. :)

      Comment

      • zeusDgod

        #63
        Listen Nighthawk, I appreciate the effort you put into ur comment...erm..essay there, but plz read the previous comments. U just repeated what every1's been saying over and over. Dont u ppl read b4 u write? I'm all for sticking it to the MAN (in this case, the 12YO BOY), but there's such a thing as too much.



        Pee-ass in the mid-east!

        Comment

        • Outrager

          #64
          Has anyone noticed the author tried to use big words to cover up his lack of English grammar and spelling? He would interchange enemy and nemesis in the same sentence just to try adding variety. Even for that really bad effort, he will still get a D- from me.



          On another note, I think it's pretty stupid when people are mocking this guy's article with comments that, they themselves, have spelling and grammatical errors.

          Comment

          • -Aragorn

            #65
            I usually make sure to look over my posts before insulting someone else about their English and grammar skills. I hate coming out as a hypocritical jackass.

            Comment

            • AceR

              #66
              ddggdsg

              Added @ [time="1021689183"]

              why doesnt my post owrk

              Added @ [time="1021689243"]

              i'm quitting cs for a few weeks or maybe til end of summer, unless you donate my a new computer.

              Added @ [time="1021689244"]

              i'm quitting cs for a few weeks or maybe til end of summer, unless you donate my a new computer.

              Comment

              • wee bull

                #67
                admin_speakall ambience/opera



                let us rejoice my friends.

                Comment

                • RockSteady

                  #68
                  Edited by [user="1322"] @ [time="1021691450"]

                  Anist wrote..

                  Why dont you arseholes grow up and appreciate that the cs world team is a bunch of fucking volunteers, they do it because they love the game and if you want to slant them for having a go then you can go shove your own sites up your arse.
                  1. I'm a "volunteer" of the csnation team. I write articles and attempt to add something to the community because I too love this game. If I wrote something like that......wait, I don't think rizzuh would let me write something like that because it's really sad. Csnation and any other website out there that takes itself halfway serious at least attempts to maintain a certain level of grammatical and sentactical sensibility in their articles.



                  2. Did you even read the article? It was hilarious the mistakes the guy made. I don't have anything against the fella; the article just looks and reads half arsed.
                  And dont tell me that you have 'brilliant sites' because i KNOW you'll of made a half dozen half arsed ones to get there.
                  3. Actually I don't "have" any brilliant sites. I've only really "worked" or submitted info to one other site and that's my personal home page. I don't care if it sucks. If it sucks it's because I'm a dork. Regardless, you're very wrong and your argument is weak.
                  If you dont have something nice to say, then dont fucking bother.
                  4. Nice words-Let's read on and see if you follow your own advice...
                  n00bs.
                  5. negative.

                  Comment

                  • Juggernaut_X1

                    #69
                    Edited by [user="29747"] @ [time="1021700072"]

                    Can you imagine that this entire brawl happened over some little naive 12 year old with terrible grammar and no FRIGGIN' clue what in the hell he might be talking about... I think he should stay in a mode of silence until he gets a firm vocabulary beneath him or better yet, don't even talk...

                    Comment

                    • Anist

                      #70
                      rocksteady, if you had any understanding of the english language, you'd know a comment is defined as:



                      A written note intended as an explanation, illustration, or criticism of a passage in a book or other writing; an annotation.



                      So dont waste your time writing an lecture because ill only tell you to fuck off with your bullshit reasoning.

                      Comment

                      • The Oracle

                        #71
                        *cough* 9/10/87 *cough*

                        Anyway, I pretty much agree with what was said in all the above, so I'm not going to repeat it. :)



                        That was a good news post asspennies... I'm still laughing, lol. :)



                        Yeah, Juggernaut, I can imagaine.



                        -The Oracle

                        Comment

                        • Outrager

                          #72
                          Oh god. People are starting to bust out the dictionary definitions.

                          Comment

                          • cHic0!

                            #73
                            The Oracle wrote..

                            *cough* 9/10/87 *cough*
                            My birthday is 9/14/87 lol... seriously

                            Comment

                            • stooopid

                              #74
                              This article sucks... it should go under counter-crap.

                              Comment

                              • Juggernaut_X1

                                #75
                                I have never agreed with someone who's name is stooopid, but I'll make an exception and say I agree that "This article sucks... it should go under counter-crap."

                                Comment

                                Working...