mailbag: bad xp

[renesisX]

[Kenshin]

over 10,000 polys? LOL

[VGK]

Oh...Lay!

[M4rine]

Have you ever seen the mask? Do you feel lucky Punk! do Ya!.

[Blood_Shot]

Toting that thing around is good exercize. +8 because the hacking has been done superbly. Can't bring myself to give it a perfect 10 or nearly perfect 9...

[renesisX]

Edited by [user="43607"] @ [time="1088978426"]

Why was my review erased? C'mon now, that's not very nice at all. I paid for this feature and you rip me off. Anyway, I myself don't like the model and it just seems WAY to weird in game. Yeah, it's funny, but it got old VERY quick.



(Jesus, I'm starting to think the Bush Administration runs this site)



[Reviews that have no substance to them will be deleted, especially if you give 1/10 and say 'ugly']



I understand your point, but sometimes you review models that are kind of a joke and you give them an 8/10 or 9/10 and it makes you wonder what's the point of rating models anyway? Ya know what I mean? Perhaps a better system is in need. Say you divvy up the 10 points between categories. Say like...3 points for creativity 3 points for something else 3 points for blah blah blah. And 1 point can be used if you really think it deserves that 10/10 special editors choice award. So here, I'll give it a three, cuz it is pretty creative and is executed decently. Anyway, that's just my 5 cents, figured I'd give some sort of constructive feedback.

[-:Nighthawk:-]

I hate this model personally, but it's incredibly well-made.



For reference guys, a 1 is 100 polygons slapped together with a 128x64 texture map horribly misaligned on it filled with clipping and missing animations. Okay, not quite, but you get the point. Part of the rating should be about preference, yes, but some should reflect the quality of the model.



As such, there's no way to justify a score of 1 as anything but an "arbitrary score," which is against the stated rules. It's not about censorship, it's about preventing the minority of people from having far more influence on the score (by giving disproportionately low scores) than the majority.



Allowing arbitrary scores of 1 for quality models would be akin to allowing scores of 20 for sub-par models, which would let the minority who really like it ("w00t, 20!") to bring the score to an unrealistically high number, despite the majority of realistic, lower scores.

[exwhyze]

ill admit this is really good, but i think it's really ugly

[sp!r!7]

It is a nicely done model alright, but it dosn't fit cs at all...

I really dont see why anyone would take the time to model this!



Like someone said: ...it's fun for a few minutes...



Whats the point??

[CARTMAN]

dumbest thing i've ever seen in my life.

[dadozer]

ROFL MIKEY!

[NightSh4de]

Damn I gotta make this a short review since im getting ready to go get drunk at a party.



This is very very very very odd. Huge amount of polys. I really don't see how or why this is SOTD but whatever. I got a few laughs out of it when it first came out a few months ago at CDG but its done pretty bad but who cares since its got a few to many things.(a few hehe) Its got its problems (and a lot of em) Its ok if your into gimmick models but not for me. 5/10

[DeadLOK]

NightSh4de, this hack was purely created as a joke - nobody would use it in any seriousness and doesn't require reviewing at all :S.

[Chilipooka]

Great Model. Deserves the 10!

[Steveman]

I am kinda dissapointed that this model made it to CSNation's SOTD. Didn't we used to have integrity? And the fact that this got an 8 makes me ashamed. The model is ugly. It has usless attachments, which usually reviewers frown on. It damn near covers the entire screen. And it only has the V models, no P, or W, no sounds, no sprites, I don't even remember if It had a readme. Regardless of what the model looks like, just based on those previously stated lackings, it should have recieved no more than a 6 In my opinion. Oh well. I guess that's why it's just my opinion.