No it is not that big of a deal but I tend to like to leave no question in my arguements which side I am on. :p
Stolen Content
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
The fact is that both articles, the original and the one DocUK made Counter-Strike-ish by doing a Find & Replace, make little-to-no sense.
Absolutely correct. When I first read the article, I actually felt SORRY for this guy because it seemed like he wanted to go somewhere interesting but didn't have the right directions. Now it all makes sense.
As for those unlucky enough to comment on how they had received Zen-like insight when they read it, now you know why. It turned out to be some sort of unintentional koan.
If it wasn't so wrong, it'd be really funny. IT IS really funny.Comment
-
yeah i'm sorry, you guys can be all mad at docuk all you want, but when i replied to that article there were one a half pages of comments about how good it was. the article was ass. i was the first person besides the guy that originally posted the real checkers article to actually say 'WHAAAAAAAAAAA.. is he talking about'Comment
-
Johnrx86 wrote..
Dude we are too, we're supposed to be like on chapter 21 or something like that now and ive only read through chapter 2.
oh man we gjust read the scarlet letter in english. SUCKS!!!
Anyway, rizzuh if you thought the article sucked, why'd you publish it?Comment
-
When I figured out what was going on (while the article was still up), I have to admit I felt pretty dumb, thus the change in title to "Gullible Moderator" that night. Yeah, had this been April 1, and DocUK gotten permission to reprint the article (with modifications), then things would have gone over a lot better. I figured he had already discussed this with rizzuh before posting it, and as I said in the earlier comments, "I bet rizzuh and DocUK are having a good laugh over this," but as we all see that was certainly not the case.
Hopefully there's not too many hard feelings over this, and we don't lose too many future matches trying to control the center of the map. :)Comment
-
iM SUCH A DUMBASS i WAS THINKING HE WAS MAKIN DIRECTIONAL REFERENCES TO THE POSITION WITHIN THE tEAM...lol WHAT A DUMBASS. Can anyone beat me for gullibility, and why are none of us who thought it was reasonable article (if a bit chessy-checkery) admitting it here, I stadn up for them and get counted, Media Spoke n we believed... A good experiment I think And shockin that it was sooo Plagirised, as a former academic I understand the sev erity of this. As a truw experiment he should have at least praisied it and added to it, Perhaps that could be a mailbag?
Rewrite the article genuinely pertaining to cs, and making the same points, but without plagirising...
Nah, anyhoo that wouldnt have been hard to do, so DocUK u let us down:<Comment
Comment