abel wrote..a skin is a skin. i dont use custom skins because im in leagues but when i wasnt in leagues, i did. i dont care if all of my skins were a knife that were able to shoot bullets, i'd still be able to own your face the same way. you're a wierdo who relies on visuals to understand stuff. be gone with you.
it was for me like that before actual scrims.. i had a specific awp model that i was really good with, when i first tried switching back it was really nasty, i couldn't hit shit with the regular awp model. i'd say its pretty psychological.
your last paragraph makes absolutely no sense, what does that have to do with proving that having different models improves your aim? besides that though, think about it. suppose you had two guns: one that looked like it could take off someones face and one that looked like a potato shooter. They both did the same amount of damage, and had the EXACT same recoil, the only difference being that one looked dominating the other wimpy. Would you or would you not you feel safer when trying to kill someone with the "dominating" one, which would allow your mind to be at ease and therefore have more focus on your target?
-
-
You zoom with the awp, the only exception is quick shooting close range enemies. How does a good AWP model make you better, you don't see it while zoomed!Comment
-
kSpro wrote..
This quote was posted on gotFrag. cl_bob IS blocked by the CAL cfg, which makes it 'illegal' in CAL, but, come on, the dude gets motion sickness when cl_bob is on! He didn't change bobcycle (which rizzuh so subtly pointed out) so therefore, he didn't use it to gain an advantage. Hell, I would venture that by turning off cl_bob, he was simply trying to get a level playing field. Isn't that what WWCL is for? To level the playing field?
cl_bob isn't illegal in CAL. These variables are not locked in 2.52 ( latest ) WWCL and WWCL isn't supported by CAL and if I'm wrong and cl_bob is illegal in cal then I think it shouldn't be as it just saves me from having to take Graval for motion sickness. I view it no as being no different then cl_dynamiccrosshair 0 or cl_righthand 1Comment
-
people on gotfrag seem oblivious to the fact that r_drawviewmodel was also deactivated...300 comments talking about how cl_bob does nothing bad and not a single person mentions that.Comment
-
kS pro never said he used r_drawviewmodel 0 because he didnt. Im not quite sure where you are getting this "inside information" "straight from kSpro himself" that not even i, the leader of shockwave know about.Comment
-
-
Edited by [user="79362"] @ [time="1055010735"]
rizzuh, if im not mistaken i do believe he is being sarcastic in that comment.Comment
-
well, he did say it, i just get the feeling that smokie has more authority on the situation than you do rizzuh =D
i think the fact that the guy gets motion sickness should merit both the original outcome of the match standing and the removal of cl_bob from cal's wwcl cfg.Comment
-
this guy could be a bigger idiot but it would be hard. First he breaks a very stupid rule specifically forbidden by CAL and blocked by WWCL, then he uploads his demo providing proof of his illegal config settings, and last but certainly not least he jokes (or he might be serious) about other config hacks he uses on gotfrag and expects everyone to just shrug it off and joke along with him even though the outcome of the match is the difference between making playoffs or not.
I think the team should be punished for having someone this retarded on their roster.Comment
-
Why couldn't this person just use a simple bind to alter the hand left or right instead?Comment
-
smokie wrote..
I can't tell one way or another. I don't see why he would even mention it, there is absolutely no context to bring it up sarcastically.
rizzuh, if im not mistaken i do believe he is being sarcastic in that comment.Comment
-
cl_bob hardly does anything.
and using cl_bobcycle 0 is more of a hinderance to aiming than helping.
http://members.lycos.co.uk/alexhamster/bobcycle08.jpg
http://members.lycos.co.uk/alexhamster/bobcycle0.jpg
these screenies i took show that while making your view higher, your aiming is still where it was at cl_bobcycle 0.8. so the only advantage of this is to toggle it on and off to see if someone is over a box or not. but this can be achieved using 'crouch-tapping'.
i see no reason for cl_bob to be locked down, seeing as it doesnt really do anything.
but if the rules are there, and by entering CAL agree by the rules, and he broke them........hmm......Comment
-
Inso[]V[]niac wrote..
CL_BOBCYCLE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS FUCKTARD
cl_bob hardly does anything.
and using cl_bobcycle 0 is more of a hinderance to aiming than helping.
http://members.lycos.co.uk/alexhamster/bobcycle08.jpg
http://members.lycos.co.uk/alexhamster/bobcycle0.jpg
these screenies i took show that while making your view higher, your aiming is still where it was at cl_bobcycle 0.8. so the only advantage of this is to toggle it on and off to see if someone is over a box or not. but this can be achieved using 'crouch-tapping'.
i see no reason for cl_bob to be locked down, seeing as it doesnt really do anything.
but if the rules are there, and by entering CAL agree by the rules, and he broke them........hmm......Comment
-
the match is being replayedComment
-
What's next, we start debating wheter or not he was using sv_aim 1?Comment
Comment