Speeding Up Your 56k

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rizzuh

    #16
    Exo wrote..

    Guys this article is really (really) in depth.
    Woah it's getting funnier each time, Colin Quinn.

    Comment

    • StealthMonkey

      #17
      =o

      Comment

      • Spoonman

        #18
        These commands turn of view bobbing when running, and improves most peoples aim (NOTE: This is NOT cheating):



        cl_bob "0"

        cl_bobup "0"

        cl_bobcycle "0"
        Funny how CAL locked these commands with the new calclient.cfg rule. Not to mention the whole TEC/Shockwave fiasco. Yup, these commands are completely legit and free of ambiguity.

        Comment

        • MikeJ

          #19
          band for config hax
          These commands turn of view bobbing when running, and improves most peoples aim (NOTE: This is NOT cheating):



          cl_bob "0"

          cl_bobup "0"

          cl_bobcycle "0"


          holy shit spoonman steal my brain why dont you

          Comment

          • poopcrap007

            #20
            why go thu all those reading of shit and get a better ping, rather then just buy cable or dsl and dont have to do any shit and get a betterer ping?

            Comment

            • Unreal Dante

              #21
              The Hermit wrote..

              That was really (really) in-depth. But I have DSL anyway HAHA 56k'ers!!!
              And because he's bragging about having DSL to 56kers I must brag now to him. I have T1 anyway HAHA DSL'ers!!! :-P



              And to the guy above me, broadband isn't an option out in whoville. Some areas can't get it no matter how much they can afford it or whatnot. What you suggested may seem simple but it's not.

              Comment

              • mcred

                #22
                arrrrgh! HEEEELP! I'm drowning in the depth!!



                Now that I've gotten that pun off my chest, I think I'll go swim in the shallow end (cos it's really (really) in depth)

                Comment

                • daniel88c

                  #23
                  lol , that was really in depth. but im to lazy to read it all =| but this comp already as cable =)

                  Comment

                  • David Johnston

                    #24
                    What's really (really) in-depth - the article?



                    And what's with them not mentioning how you can double the speed of a modem by tripling the current from the power-supply?

                    Comment

                    • Blankster

                      #25
                      im sure nighthawk would love this article = )

                      Comment

                      • Spoonman

                        #26
                        David Johnston wrote..

                        And what's with them not mentioning how you can double the speed of a modem by tripling the current from the power-supply?
                        That not only sounds safe, but also sounds like fun for the whole family. Not to mention the fun inherent when breaking FCC regulations prohibiting 56k modem speeds over 53k.



                        rofl, I hope someone actually tries that (if it's even possible) and watch them burn out their motherboard if not more.

                        Comment

                        • Dangki

                          #27
                          I remember rumours about that with the Dreamcasts modem but I've never heard it done with a PC.



                          Who the hell is the FCC anyway? Is it an american thing?

                          Comment

                          • Stylez

                            #28
                            Federal Communications ca-somethingiforgot

                            Comment

                            • Spoonman

                              #29
                              Federal Communications Commission. Quoth:
                              The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was established by the Communications Act of 1934 and is charged with regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable.

                              Comment

                              • CabalSoljea

                                #30
                                Nighthawk's reading this really (really) closely...

                                Comment

                                Working...