Heh, so few people can agree to disagree on the internet nowadays (it seems). I'm okay with you not considering it a game.
I would state it as 'not a typical game' which basically amounts to the same thing, different wording. So all we're really 'arguing' about is the wording, and how important is that, really? We both agree the 'game' sucks and isn't worth playing, lol.
I think even people that like playing this would quickly get bored. When I saw it in the video, I thought it would be cool to have this as a (not directly interactive) music visualizer rather than an interactive music maker. Maybe the designer should think about doing that instead. Then we could all agree it's not a game, lol.
But yeah, nice chattin' with you, and thanks for the CYOA memories!
I would state it as 'not a typical game' which basically amounts to the same thing, different wording. So all we're really 'arguing' about is the wording, and how important is that, really? We both agree the 'game' sucks and isn't worth playing, lol.
I think even people that like playing this would quickly get bored. When I saw it in the video, I thought it would be cool to have this as a (not directly interactive) music visualizer rather than an interactive music maker. Maybe the designer should think about doing that instead. Then we could all agree it's not a game, lol.
But yeah, nice chattin' with you, and thanks for the CYOA memories!
Comment