Creative Assembly: Combating piracy is "pointless."

[=98=]

Re: Creative Assembly: Combating piracy is "pointless."

Seriously. Who would buy something that would limit their privacy and freedom like that?

As long as it worked, i wouldn't care.

[Dairuka]

Re: Creative Assembly: Combating piracy is "pointless."

They wouldn't stop with anti-cheating, and you know it.

[=98=]

Re: Creative Assembly: Combating piracy is "pointless."

Perhaps. To be honest, such a system will never exist due to privacy implications and it would need software to operate which again, could be hacked and reverse engineered.

It could even give unauthorised access to low level areas of your PC. So, yea, probably not the best idea ever.

[Dairuka]

Re: Creative Assembly: Combating piracy is "pointless."

Perhaps. To be honest, such a system will never exist due to privacy implications and it would need software to operate which again, could be hacked and reverse engineered.

It could even give unauthorised access to low level areas of your PC. So, yea, probably not the best idea ever.

This is why I like Steam.

It offers a modest amount of protection without completely stampeding on the rights of the legitimate consumers.

It's not perfect, but it does give buyers a wealth of benefits.

There will never be a perfect answer to end piracy...

[MrChris_CJ]

Re: Creative Assembly: Combating piracy is "pointless."

I believe Intel were looking at adding the function to their cpus, comparing the player movements to what was happening on screen is a good idea imo, do the inputs match the expected outputs basically