Call of Duty: World at War v1.1 Patch Released

[CptainCrunch]

Re: Call of Duty: World at War v1.1 Patch Released

so is hardcore the real hardcore[the hits]?

IF the command is put in to adjust the health to 30%, yes. If you just choose hardcore 1, then it will take away all the overhead stuff, but your health will still be 100%.

So if you want hardcore to be like CoD4, you put this in:

set scr_hardcore "1"
scr_player_maxhealth "30"

Crunch

[imported_Whiskey]

Re: Call of Duty: World at War v1.1 Patch Released

That was fast...good to see.

[^Garf*uk*]

Re: Call of Duty: World at War v1.1 Patch Released

IF the command is put in to adjust the health to 30%, yes. If you just choose hardcore 1, then it will take away all the overhead stuff, but your health will still be 100%.

So if you want hardcore to be like CoD4, you put this in:

set scr_hardcore "1"
scr_player_maxhealth "30"

Crunch

thxs m8y :thumbsup:

thought would of done it like cod4 hardcore though

[imported_Whiskey]

Re: Call of Duty: World at War v1.1 Patch Released

For those who don't know, this patch is big (+300 MB), so I suggest that after you download and apply it, save it somewhere on your hard-drive. That way you won't have to download it all over again if you have to re-install the game.

[imported_ATM743]

Re: Call of Duty: World at War v1.1 Patch Released

what is the health at in hardcore on this game then ??

60 instead of 30? tbh i dont mind this cause of the 1 hit bolt action kills but we'll see

i get my copy of it tomorrow so ill see how it goes.

[CptainCrunch]

Re: Call of Duty: World at War v1.1 Patch Released

what is the health at in hardcore on this game then ??

60 instead of 30? tbh i dont mind this cause of the 1 hit bolt action kills but we'll see

i get my copy of it tomorrow so ill see how it goes.

Its regular mode health if you do nothing, so 100%.

Though they dont specify what they did, the patch has some "weapon balance" in it. I think that is some of the bolt changes.

Crunch

[troybob]

Re: Call of Duty: World at War v1.1 Patch Released

That's not hardcore

they should just call it "sans crosshair mode"

Was this the case in the beta?

-t

[iQue]

Re: Call of Duty: World at War v1.1 Patch Released

Good, maybe now everyone will realise you don't need a full clip to kill in softcore...

K, I'll get back into my little CoD4 corner now...

[imported_Whiskey]

Re: Call of Duty: World at War v1.1 Patch Released

they should just call it "sans crosshair mode"

Was this the case in the beta?

Yes, just a lot of people didn't know about all the health options that could be adjusted.

HC now basically means "no HUD", as you said. Health & health regen speed can be adjusted in both modes now.

[troybob]

Re: Call of Duty: World at War v1.1 Patch Released

Yes, just a lot of people didn't know about all the health options that could be adjusted.

HC now basically means "no HUD", as you said. Health & health regen speed can be adjusted in both modes now.

I don't understand why they didn't copy HC from CoD4. As you said, the health and regen speed can be adjusted - so why not leave HC alone and let servers change it to "sans crosshairs mode" if they don't like playing with realistic health settings (I.E. HC mode).

It just doesn't make any sense at all. Hardcore should be hardcore - not "softcore sans crosshairs"

Maybe I'll cuss someone out on my blog while drunk. That seems to be the theme

[imported_Whiskey]

Re: Call of Duty: World at War v1.1 Patch Released

I dunno...I think it's a good thing, overall. I just think we need some way to filter or identify what server options are running.

The way it is now, both modes are equally flexible in terms of options, just with different displays (no HUD).

[troybob]

Re: Call of Duty: World at War v1.1 Patch Released

I dunno...I think it's a good thing, overall. I just think we need some way to filter or identify what server options are running.

The way it is now, both modes are equally flexible in terms of options, just with different displays (no HUD).

While I agree that they are equally flexible - I don't think they should have used the term Hardcore when everyone is accustomed to hardcore from CoD4.

It's like renaming domination to capture the flag. While it is close - it is not the same.

My point is that a little consistency would be good.

[^Garf*uk*]

Re: Call of Duty: World at War v1.1 Patch Released

While I agree that they are equally flexible - I don't think they should have used the term Hardcore when everyone is accustomed to hardcore from CoD4.

It's like renaming domination to capture the flag. While it is close - it is not the same.

My point is that a little consistency would be good.

1+ :thumbsup:

[Kodakk]

Re: Call of Duty: World at War v1.1 Patch Released

Oh stop your whining, I'd say 95% of the servers up at the moment are running hardcore - and I'm sure that most of them will put the "proper" HC settings up. :/

[troybob]

Re: Call of Duty: World at War v1.1 Patch Released

Oh stop your whining, I'd say 95% of the servers up at the moment are running hardcore - and I'm sure that most of them will put the "proper" HC settings up. :/

OK so anyways,

Wouldn't you agree that it would make more sense that if 95% of the servers change their settings, that the settings should just come like that?

I don't know maybe it's just me but Hardcore was popular for multiple reasons - not just one.

It is a combination of things not just "no crosshair"