Point of Existence 2 Mod Update #82

[jilted]

Re: Point of Existence 2 Mod Update #82

The smaller versions of ALL the maps are more infantry oriented. If thats your cup of tea, I suggest you try some of those.

[[TW]Airborne]

Re: Point of Existence 2 Mod Update #82

Dethred

Then don't play the 64 player maps. Play the 32 and 16 for the infantry combat.

As for me I play 64 player maps only. If I want Good infantry combat I play America's Army or GRAWF.

BF game have always been about ALL OUT WAR with tanks ifvs inf helos jets not just infantry.

AB

[Lobo[FH]]

Re: Point of Existence 2 Mod Update #82

It needs to be balanced.

What are you talking about?, a tank must be tough to be destroyed, are you requesting a soldier must be able to destroy tanks for breakfast?, sorry man, this is not Rambo III, wake up.

My opinion is totally diferent, with all those helis, planes, unreal mines deployed in 0.01 seconds, C4's, bazookamen bunnyhoppers of doom...to be tanker is to be a suicide.

Disclaimer: I enjoy to be infantery grunt, I am not one of those tank whores, but I want to feel fear as soldier vs. a tank, I don't want to be "balanced"

[Dethred]

Re: Point of Existence 2 Mod Update #82

What are you talking about?, a tank must be tough to be destroyed, are you requesting a soldier must be able to destroy tanks for breakfast?, sorry man, this is not Rambo III, wake up.

My opinion is totally diferent, with all those helis, planes, unreal mines deployed in 0.01 seconds, C4's, bazookamen bunnyhoppers of doom...to be tanker is to be a suicide.

Disclaimer: I enjoy to be infantery grunt, I am not one of those tank whores, but I want to feel fear as soldier vs. a tank, I don't want to be "balanced"

See, I was wondering what your first paragraph was about, then i read on and discovered that you're batcrap insane. Armorwhoring is suicide? Are you stupid or just suck at the game?

First off, if I want close in 16 player combat I'll play some CS:S. I got BF2 for huge maps and lots of people to shoot at. I get to play on a good balanced map maybe once every 5 maps in a 64 player server. I don't want smaller maps, I want a reasonable amount of tanks.

For all of those dismissing what I say or making completely rediculous remarks like the guy above, keep track of the armor whores in a map and see what percentage of them hold the top 5-10 spots on each team. Maybe that will be proof that you're wrong.

PS: I resorted to this level of demeanor in reaction to you guys, not vice versa.

[Lobo[FH]]

Re: Point of Existence 2 Mod Update #82

First I suggest you don't insult me, second, you understood crap in my post (yes, my english is horrible but try it harder, son).

Yes, tanking is sometimes suicide, and I don't suck, thanks. You want to win on foot in a head to head combat against a 6 million dollars behemoth-----> "balanced" crap. I tell to destroy a tank must be tough

[HaVOCK-ElEEt]

Re: Point of Existence 2 Mod Update #82

Everyone enjoys a different kind of game, so play the one that suits you best. Stop telling people how the game should be made, because plenty of people will disagree, no matter what your point is.

Want to know what I dont understand, why people use the sig about not supporting 2142, or why they put thier detailed specs about the PC they use, who the hell cares, lol. Should we date now? Is your processor fast enough to handle me big boy?

If you dont want to play 2142, dont buy it. BF2 is not as messed as you guys always claim, you probaly just arent very good players, and have no idea how to addapt.

[[GCA]Tim270]

Re: Point of Existence 2 Mod Update #82

nice update keep up the great work POE team

[Dethred]

Re: Point of Existence 2 Mod Update #82

First I suggest you don't insult me, second, you understood crap in my post (yes, my english is horrible but try it harder, son).

Yes, tanking is sometimes suicide, and I don't suck, thanks. You want to win on foot in a head to head combat against a 6 million dollars behemoth-----> "balanced" crap. I tell to destroy a tank must be tough

YOU ARE HILARIOUS! My first suggestion is not pretending like your crap doesn't stink. Second, I figured you were either a foreigner or a child by your text... now I know you're both. Three, Don't call a grown adult "Son", it makes you look like a huge jack@ss.

You tell me... Can a 6-million dollar tank withstand several pounds of high explosive on its moving parts? No. Can a Tank withstand an anti-tank round, specifically designed to penetrate its armor and spread shrapnel inside the cab? No.

So stop talking realism when those two things don't happen in the game. I ask for more balance and you say its not realistic to make it balanced, yet the only way to destroy a tank in POE2 is NOT REALISTIC!

I feel like I'm arguing against a 5 year old.

[[FHDev]Stranger]

Re: Point of Existence 2 Mod Update #82

"Batcrap insane", " jack@ss", "crap doesn't stink.", "arguing with a 5 year old"

Wow! Your use of childish invective is devastating. How could anyone fail to perceive your maturity and agree immediately with your dispassionate and well reasoned arguments?




Btw, Nice job, POE!

[Dethred]

Re: Point of Existence 2 Mod Update #82

Wow! Your use of childish invective is devastating. How could anyone fail to perceive your maturity and agree immediately with your dispassionate and well reasoned arguments?




Btw, Nice job, POE!

Wow! Great use of the dictionary. In all of your linquistic bull$hit you have completely failed as a human being and completely failed at adding anything to this thread except showing that you can open a dictionary. Nice try at arguing for your friend.

BTW, Nice Job POE, I just have a few criticisms that get shouted down by complete knuckledraggers.

Dethred

Then don't play the 64 player maps. Play the 32 and 16 for the infantry combat.

As for me I play 64 player maps only. If I want Good infantry combat I play America's Army or GRAWF.

BF game have always been about ALL OUT WAR with tanks ifvs inf helos jets not just infantry.

AB

I would, but I play BF2 because my clan does. I mean, you guys have at least 3 version of what seem to be almost identical maps (the tundra-like ones) where its literally just a tank battle. I can count 2 maps where its even feasible to get a decent score as infantry.

[Lobo[FH]]

Re: Point of Existence 2 Mod Update #82

...random bla bla bla...

Listen...son...maybe you have 85 years and are having good time playing Bridge in an elders holidays camp in Florida but you have the bad education of a 3 years old whining baby punk...consider yourself spanked.

Listen..again...you have shared your opinion about what doesn't work in PoE...IN YOUR OPINION...and I have shared the oposite opinion, if you can handle free speech fine...if not, frankly dear i dont give a damn.

In a real battle the soldiers are afraid when they spot an enemy tank, they call air support, arti support, inform their commanders about the serious threat to get reinforcements, specialized help, etc.

Your concept of balance (feel free to correct me if I am wrong) means you want to be some kind of uber soldier and destroy that tank all by yourself, and get your fantastic uber score, be the top ten and the party queen...well, it's fine but I disagree, and now go away

[[TW]Airborne]

Re: Point of Existence 2 Mod Update #82

Dethred

As a real life retired E-7 Airborne Infantryman I can tell you, WE DO NOT FIGHT TANKS AND IFVs up close. The AT-4 RPG SMAW will not penetrate the armor of a MBT. Now the milan and other systems of that type will but we do it at long range same with the TOW.

We can not make everyone happy. If you like BF2 better than by all means please go back and play bf2.

AB

[Doctor Venture]

Re: Point of Existence 2 Mod Update #82

Well spoken boys.
I can see everyones point of existence in this post.

[jilted]

Re: Point of Existence 2 Mod Update #82

I am rather a fan of Lobo's work for FH, think he has a pretty good view of how mods for BF games work. I would at least listen to his comments

Thanks for the support guys, appreciated.

[HaVOCK-ElEEt]

Re: Point of Existence 2 Mod Update #82

Dethred

As a real life retired E-7 Airborne Infantryman I can tell you, WE DO NOT FIGHT TANKS AND IFVs up close. The AT-4 RPG SMAW will not penetrate the armor of a MBT. Now the milan and other systems of that type will but we do it at long range same with the TOW.

We can not make everyone happy. If you like BF2 better than by all means please go back and play bf2.

AB

Theres no point in arguing wether or not a game should be more realistic, or more balanced and arcade like in speed.

BF2 doesnt offer much arcade like action really. The weapons might be innacurate, but try running with all that gear on in the sun, diving to the floor, and accurately shooting a man from 50 feet. I bet [TW]Airborne partner would also say that its not likely.

I think BF2 rightly added the fact that its totaly unrealisitc to move like that. Maybe it was just nerfed, but then again its all how you look at it.

I think all styles of games are fun. Realism, Arcade like games, and especially, racing my son in Mario Kart. No wait, playing my wife at Tetris, now thats fun (except she always wins)