"FLASHBANG OVERPOWERED!!!"
".50 MOUNTED MACHINE GUN UNDERPOWERED"!!!"
"DEFIBRILATOR OVERPOWERED!!!"
"FORKLIFT UNDERPOWERED!!!"
LOL
I'm tired of whiners, and threads of the type "such and such overpowered", and "such and such underpowered".
For example it was ridiculous to read a thread saying that the essex is overpowered, followed by another one a day later saying that the essex is underpowered, just because the first guy was a lousy pilot, and the second guy had a different concept of what the essex can and can't do.
The game is balanced, face it. If a weapon/vehicle of certain army is more powerful than the weapon/vehicle of another army, that's because the first army has another weapon/vehicle that's less powerful compared to some other weapon/vehicle of the second army. The J-10 will always have a small edge over the F-35, same as the blackhawk has an edge over the mi-17, or the mi-28 over the cobra. However the armies in general are balanced. Accept that fact and stop whining.
".50 MOUNTED MACHINE GUN UNDERPOWERED"!!!"
"DEFIBRILATOR OVERPOWERED!!!"
"FORKLIFT UNDERPOWERED!!!"
LOL
I'm tired of whiners, and threads of the type "such and such overpowered", and "such and such underpowered".
For example it was ridiculous to read a thread saying that the essex is overpowered, followed by another one a day later saying that the essex is underpowered, just because the first guy was a lousy pilot, and the second guy had a different concept of what the essex can and can't do.
The game is balanced, face it. If a weapon/vehicle of certain army is more powerful than the weapon/vehicle of another army, that's because the first army has another weapon/vehicle that's less powerful compared to some other weapon/vehicle of the second army. The J-10 will always have a small edge over the F-35, same as the blackhawk has an edge over the mi-17, or the mi-28 over the cobra. However the armies in general are balanced. Accept that fact and stop whining.
Comment