Traffic Jam

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HYP3R

    #76
    Re: Traffic Jam

    4 well placed C4s would blow everyone of those to hell. Kinda like GTA

    Comment

    • SgtMaj.Sudano

      #77
      Re: Traffic Jam

      How do you do that? Can you spawn stuff in bf2?

      Comment

      • Robske007a

        #78
        Re: Traffic Jam

        I've seen better, its just a picture taken with the editor, nothing special

        Comment

        • Robske007a

          #79
          Re: Traffic Jam

          Originally posted by SgtMaj.Sudano
          How do you do that? Can you spawn stuff in bf2?
          It's done with the BF2 editor

          Comment

          • Pelton

            #80
            Re: Traffic Jam

            Oh to have my trigger on the artillery button. May not get any kills but would be nice to see all them go boom.

            Comment

            • FordMustang

              #81
              Re: Traffic Jam

              Robske, it's not the editor. Its a server side mod, so you could go into the Sir Server and do it yourself, but i think it's on mash potato city right now :p


              You guy's should see the APC bridges from Carrier to shore on oman!

              Comment

              • Jordan_W

                #82
                Re: Traffic Jam

                .................

                Comment

                • Blue Shadow

                  #83
                  Re: Traffic Jam

                  Feel the need to educate those of you who are uneducated with the following completely useless information:

                  The Plane featured in BF2 is the F-35B this is the only variant that has the 'lift-fan' required to hover. In real life it canNOT take of Vertically with a full payload (one of the many inaccuracies in BF2) hence as shown in the picture below it has STOLV (Short Take Off and Vertical Landing) written on the tail-fin. It is in fact the Harrier REPLACEMENT and most certainly not the Harrier itself or the F-22. It is being / been developed in the US (because that's where Lockheed Martin is based) however there has been heavy involment from BAE Systems and Rolls-Royce (UK based companies). Another inaccuracy in BF2 is the fact the F-35B isn't even designed to be operated from an aircraft carrier as it doesn't feature the stronger undercarrige required to land (although due to its ability to land vertically there is no reason why it shouldn't) so in theory when u come into land the F-35 on the carrier 'normally' the undercarridge should snap off and you should be killed as the plane crashes (the lack of ejector seets prevent you from escaping safely). The Aircraft carrier variant is the F-35C which as it happens is the only variant capable of carrying 2000lb bombs like those dropped in BF2 so you could say the Dice just invented the F-35N (N00b designation) plane.

                  Originally posted by zephyrus
                  that is not an f-22 its an f-35 and yes it can take-off and land verticaly and can fly at supersonic speed unlike the harrier that is slower.

                  While I'm talking about the American aircraft and the inaccuracy of BF2 i'll also quickly point out that there is only one variant of the AH-1 with four rotor blades the AH-1Z which as far as I'm aware is actually fitted with an IR Jammer making all the SAM sites in BF2 completely useless. Ah now wouldn't that make life easier.

                  Comment

                  • Karl

                    #84
                    Re: Traffic Jam

                    Originally posted by Robske007a
                    It's done with the BF2 editor
                    Nope, hop into the Sir Server (64.154.39.162:16567 | Password = smacktard) and try it yourself man

                    Comment

                    • nevrotiK

                      #85
                      Re: Traffic Jam

                      Thank god for VTO

                      Comment

                      • Private_Adam
                        Member
                        • Oct 2005
                        • 229

                        #86
                        Re: Traffic Jam

                        lol thats a good one

                        Comment

                        • N2K

                          #87
                          Re: Traffic Jam

                          Originally posted by Sir. Karl
                          Nope, hop into the Sir Server (64.154.39.162:16567 | Password = smacktard) and try it yourself man
                          And tell them its not with Photoshop either

                          Comment

                          • Karl

                            #88
                            Re: Traffic Jam

                            And it was not done in photoshop, go and try it yourself if you dont believe me...

                            Comment

                            • Sniper926

                              #89
                              Re: Traffic Jam

                              Great pic...looks like an impound lot !!!
                              "Sorry Sir, we clocked you doing 900mph in a 800mph zone...we're going to have to ask you to surrender your vehicle..."

                              All I gotta ask is "Who left room for those pesky choppers on the rear of the carrier ????"

                              Comment

                              • StalkerZERO

                                #90
                                Re: Traffic Jam

                                Originally posted by irishblade89
                                Those aren't the big Nimitz classes of the Navy. They're just USMC assault carriers.

                                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphibious_assault_ship Here's more info on 'em.

                                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Essex_%28LHD-2%29 This is the one featured in the game.
                                Cool I had no idea. :|:
                                Is there a mod that actually has a real modern carrier then?

                                Comment

                                Working...