Mine: Lego?

[Sir. XaliaS]

Re: Mine: Lego?

Ok I'm posting now because it's getting pretty silly, and I need to voice my opinion.
This lego video was sourced from the Mine soundtrack.
Mine was sourced from lots of other sources put together (Monty Python, sound bikes, music, etc.) EVERYBODY DOES IT!

There is no difference in saying the Lego video was a rip than saying Mine was a total rip of everything it had in content.
As long as the authors are credited in some from (even if it is vague) it’s ok.
I can understand this is a dispute over what exactly is crediting, but it's really nothing to get worked up about.
Nobodies making a profit, and sewing a fan base video against another fan base video won't work.

[Jackass]

Re: Mine: Lego?

Erm XaliaS, that's not how it works.. This was taken from Mine ofcourse, because you can obviously see that the exact same things comes in the same row as Mine, the same things happened. It's obvious.

[Talus]

Re: Mine: Lego?

That video was absolutely pathetic and a complete and utter rip-off.

[Sir. XaliaS]

Re: Mine: Lego?

What's what in how that doesn't work?

Snoken took the work from Monty python, this guy took the work from Snoken. It works the same basis, just that the lego video was utter crap.

Snoken has a right to be upset with this guy, he made a ridicule out of mine whether he was trying to or not.
But I can't find a reason to sue. (unless your one of the fall over in the street and sue the pavement scum :p )

[Jackass]

Re: Mine: Lego?

Doh, I haven't said that Snoken should sue the people behind a Lego movie, that's just stupid and ridiculous.

and I am sure Noken won't. :) Btw, Noken took a couple of scenes from Monthy Python which is legal, he showed them in a new way and made them even more fun. That's called taking ideas not making a total rip off.

Taking ideas and doing a rip off is two totally different things. :)

[Guidon666]

Re: Mine: Lego?

that was total bs! noken should sue his (big bleeping sound)

Oh yeah... he should sue away...
Sue sue sue.... because he lost so much money with this video that was made.

Christ! Grow up! Couldnt sue if he wanted to.

However, back on topic. I wouldnt necessarily say rip off. I would say the creator saw your video... really liked it and wanted to mimic it. I dont hink it hurts yours in anyway. In fact I would say more people are probly looking for it again to see the great original.

[Gawwad]

Re: Mine: Lego?

A lot better than that BF2 crap...

[Darkstar10]

Re: Mine: Lego?

only because you still play with legos :P

[[Ret]B|Kayess]

Re: Mine: Lego?

For those of you who have never seen "Mine", check it out! - http://battlefield2.filefront.com/fi...ductions;47488

well that was a pointless post, who hasnt seen mine?

[Sir. Shpox]

Re: Mine: Lego?

Whatever it is, that is probably the worst game or whatever it is I've seen. It burns my eyes. Like 3 fps and the graphics ugh, It makes me want to go Emo.

[FLIPINOM4D]

Re: Mine: Lego?

That video was absolutely pathetic and a complete and utter rip-off.

yup............................................... ...........................and it was a lego game EEK!

[Dlab37]

Re: Mine: Lego?

well that was a pointless post, who hasnt seen mine?

i havent untill now, i have heard about it but it wasnt really that funny. compared to the crap lego one it was amazing though

[imported_Noken]

Re: Mine: Lego?

Haha, yea I will sue them! Hehe, no it's a tribute in my eyes.

[Karl]

Re: Mine: Lego?

That was pathetic