SPECOPS-Retarded

[=PM=Unity]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

So much hostility. Why not just play the game instead of complaining on the forums? Live, learn, and adapt. Everyone seems to think that it was "whiners" that caused the nerfing and patch. Seems rather intelligent if you ask me for a game developer to heed what the community thinks. Granted it obviously is to be taken with a grain of salt.

Are the forums always this heated at patch time? I have only been around for a month and a half and enjoyed the forums far more when there was some constructive posting going on and not just ranting about everything. Can I hope that the forums will head back to normal in another few weeks?

- Unity

[Azriel]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

Agreed. I also love in when I'm called a whiner, while its these same people that "whined" loud enough that EA was forced to do something about it.

With a name like C4whore4eva I'm not suprised you're ****ed.:laugh:
If people like you didn't use it like a frisbee all day long, and used a gun every once and a while, Spec Ops wouldn't have be nerfed that way. You abused it, now all S.O.'s got screwed. The guy who started this thread can thank the likes of you for this.

[Sloi sauce]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

You place C4, you place mines! Period--the ability to throw them should have never been there in the first place. Now that you can't EXPLOIT anymore it you whine. You have 3 options now--don't play Specops/use c4, play and quit crying about it or just quit playing.

Mines are "drop and forget" weapons, whereas one must babysit the C4 until a vehicle arrives: depending on your luck, it may be too late when it does...

Your options reveal nothing more than a narrow and shortsighted mind.

[iambananas]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

Yep, this is actually the only problem I have with the patch. I was never a C4 chucker in the first place, but I often deployed the tactics he mentioned. And it hardly bothers me. I love this patch:) And people should follow my example.

[ODBoy]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

Mines are "drop and forget" weapons, whereas one must babysit the C4 until a vehicle arrives: depending on your luck, it may be too late when it does...

Your options reveal nothing more than a narrow and shortsighted mind.

Moron...you dont just drop them anywhere and sit and wait. You see an aproaching vehicle, c4 the sidess of road, hide. Vehicle drives between c4, click boom. Get it lamer...

[Talus]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

There is no 'right way' to lay down C4...if somebody wants to set a trap...let them.

No need for name calling.

[ODBoy]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

There is no 'right way' to lay down C4...if somebody wants to set a trap...let them.

No need for name calling.

K big man, merely pointing out that he doesnt have to babysit C4, didnt mention right or wrong, as I suspect you know. Another post though eh...

[Paas]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

from ur logic, If I need to hammer a nail into a wall, and I happened not to have a hammer by my side, all I have is a piece of brick, I shouldn't use the brick to hammer the nail in because the brick is for building buildings, not for hammering nails.

No. By my logic, it's not your Job to "Compete" with Anti-Tank for, well, Anti-Tank applications. If you cannot find current ways, within' the confines of your class, to disable and destroy a tank. Leave it alone!

Nothing should be modified to give you a better chance in direct assaults against a tank. Your kit "abbilities" as as follows, [Outrageously Accurate Carbine, C4 Trap abbilities, Asset Destroyer]. That's what you're supposed to be doing. Right there, in a nutshell.

If you stumble across a Tank, sneak up on it and disarm it. If you run across a tank, "Don'T" think you should be allowed to engage it from any reasonable range because that is the "SOLE ABBILITY" of Anti-Tank. They engage vehicles from a distance, not Spec-Ops.

...and that Brick/Hammer analogy was cute. I like it. :laugh:

{WP}Paas

[Zilon]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

What I don't understand is how the soldiers have superhuman strength while throwing grenades, easily getting them over the highest buildings, yet turn into wimps while holding a claymore/medi/c4 and can barely even throw it - rather just lett it fall to the floor.

Crazy stuff.

[{wxc}panda]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

No. By my logic, it's not your Job to "Compete" with Anti-Tank for, well, Anti-Tank applications. If you cannot find current ways, within' the confines of your class, to disable and destroy a tank. Leave it alone!

Nothing should be modified to give you a better chance in direct assaults against a tank. Your kit "abbilities" as as follows, [Outrageously Accurate Carbine, C4 Trap abbilities, Asset Destroyer]. That's what you're supposed to be doing. Right there, in a nutshell.

If you stumble across a Tank, sneak up on it and disarm it. If you run across a tank, "Don'T" think you should be allowed to engage it from any reasonable range because that is the "SOLE ABBILITY" of Anti-Tank. They engage vehicles from a distance, not Spec-Ops.

...and that Brick/Hammer analogy was cute. I like it. :laugh:

{WP}Paas

why r u keep saying specop is competing with anti-tank?
they attack armors in different ways, anti-tank takes out armor from longer range at a slower rate, specops takes out armor by sneak onto it from short range. why do u insist that taking out armor should be anti-tanks job and his job only? if u r a specop and a tank is capping ur flag in front of u; u r just gonna sit there and watch? i got fed up with ur retarded theory. continue believing that only anti-tank can take out tanks, good luck. no more arguement with u.

[Paas]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

why r u keep saying specop is competing with anti-tank?
they attack armors in different ways, anti-tank takes out armor from longer range at a slower rate, specops takes out armor by sneak onto it from short range. why do u insist that taking out armor should be anti-tanks job and his job only? if u r a specop and a tank is capping ur flag in front of u; u r just gonna sit there and watch? i got fed up with ur retarded theory. continue believing that only anti-tank can take out tanks, good luck. no more arguement with u.

I didn't say only Anti-Tank can take out tanks!? What the hell are you reading!? Jesus! I swear, it's like I type on thing on these damn forums and I get responses for 70+ other things that I didn't type!

I figure I do a good job of conveying tone, direction, humor. Yet, all I get back is a senseless debate with someone who "Obviously" lacks comprehension skills!

Look, let me break it down for you in one paragraph!

" Spec-Ops and Anti-Tank and both take out Armor. Yes, true. YET! Spec-Ops should in no way "Compete" with Anti-Tank in that role. Spec-Ops gets to dabble in the ability, yet, their ability to be very limited; ala. you need to Run and "Stick" the C4 to the tank to accomplish the same goal that Anti-Tank can from a distance. With ease. As it was pre 1.2 Spec-Ops had the capablility to extend that "Stick" range to a point were they could compete with Anti-Tank for Anti-Tank applications... now, you need to actually sneak up on the tank. If you cannot sneak up on the tank, and you die, leave it the heck alone! ...or, spawn out Anti-Tank; you know that kid that's built around taking out armor? That one!? Yeah.. try it somtime!"

...if that doesn't sum up what I'm saying. You seriously need to look into ENG 2302 or somthing.

{WP}Paas

[Revoluti0n]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

Imagine u got roaches in ur house and EA takes ur whole house away so u dont have to worry about the roach problem anymore?
u can always try to adapting the new environment, OUTSIDE.

LOL!!!

[Sloi sauce]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

Moron...you dont just drop them anywhere and sit and wait. You see an aproaching vehicle, c4 the sidess of road, hide. Vehicle drives between c4, click boom. Get it lamer...

You don't necessarily have the requisite time to do this, which is why it pays off to be ready prior to the arrival of a vehicle: however, your "technique" leaves too much to blind chance whereas the throwing of packs over fences, for example, makes the vehicles more cognizant of these possibilities and makes the game more interesting.

The dumbing down of this game is revolting and I for one won't stand much more of it: it's a good thing I can still rape with my helo, because the ground fighting is little more than a variation of the CS kind now. I shudder to think of the changes that will be made when the next patch is released...