SPECOPS-Retarded

[Talus]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

You don't expect spec ops to use tactics and SKILL now do you??!?!?

:laugh:

[hamwbone]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

also, is there a military c4 pack that when thrown 4-6 m sticks to the side of a moving tank?

[Chowley]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

Does anyone else feel that throwing distance is actually shorter though? Maybe it was lag on my end, although not sure lag would make it look like that :|

[imported_Panic.fo]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

I think you're just ****ed off because your favourite exploit has been fixed..

Furthermore I think you've misunderstood completely the concept of the Spec Ops class..

You can whine all you want but it's here to stay ^^

[dblEdge]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

I play special-ops regularly and I can understand his point but at the same time, running up to a tank and using stealth adds to the fun and adrenaline! I never used it to bunnyhop around and kill people as that's just plain sad. It's unfortunate that it can't be thrown over walls etc but all I can say is get used to it.

[{wxc}panda]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

Look. It's NOT the job of the SpecOps players to destroy vehicles at long range. You're NOT the counter tactic for Armor and Helos. You set traps, destory assets, and wreak havoc with your outrageously accurate Carbines.

It's Anti-Tanks job to take on "Tanks/APCs/Helos/Jets/Wheeled thingies n' such" directly. You are supposed to set traps, not mount a direct assault on a tank. I mean, the way it was before Anti-Tank was basically worthless. You could get the job done a lot quicker and safer with a C4-Charge. Just hop to the tank, toss it, and hop out of the blast range.

Now, you need to plan ahead. Waaaaaay ahead. You need to set traps, and destroy assets. That's what you do. That's the confines of your kit. You're not an infantry powerhouse like Assault/Support, you're not Anti-Vehicle exclusively like Anti-Tank/Engineer. You're a UAV blower-upper, and a Trap setter. Think Ninja, not Samurai (Did I spell that correctly? :P)

{WP}Paas

A lot of ppl saying it's a antitanks job blahblah, DID U EVEN READ MY POST AT FIRST PLACE.
All the situations that I mentioned about are when u ENCOUNTERED an armored vehicle BY CHANCE at SHORT RANGE. I never said to let a specops to be a full-time tank buster. GEEz would ppl learn to fully understand what ppl are trying to say before they disagree.

[Paas]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

A lot of ppl saying it's a antitanks job blahblah, DID U EVEN READ MY POST AT FIRST PLACE.
All the situations that I mentioned about are when u ENCOUNTERED an armored vehicle BY CHANCE at SHORT RANGE. I never said to let a specops to be a full-time tank buster. GEEz would ppl learn to fully understand what ppl are trying to say before they disagree.

I did read your post. I understood it perfectly... No matter "WHAT" the encounter, your job is not to engage armor.

Now, you have the capability to do it by chance yet, it doesn't mean you should be actively seeking that role. That's the job of Anti-Tank. Simple. If you run into a situation where you lose to a tank nothing should be modified to bolster your chances, because "YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE MESSING WITH TANKS!".

...Assault, Medic, Support, Engineer (for the most part), and Sniper all have to run from Tanks when they come into a direct contact. At least you have the ability to sneak up on one and render him useless. Be happy that Spec Ops even gets to dabble in the roles of other kits, because it doesn't work that way for anyone else.

{WP}Paas

[{wxc}panda]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

I think you're just ****ed off because your favourite exploit has been fixed..

Furthermore I think you've misunderstood completely the concept of the Spec Ops class..

You can whine all you want but it's here to stay ^^

lol i love these idiots keep saying I loved the "exploit" when I suggested another way to fix air-bursting c4. u dont deserve to post in a forum.

[{wxc}panda]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

I did read your post. I understood it perfectly... No matter "WHAT" the encounter, your job is not to engage armor.

Now, you have the capability to do it by chance yet, it doesn't mean you should be actively seeking that role. That's the job of Anti-Tank. Simple. If you run into a situation where you lose to a tank nothing should be modified to bolster your chances, because "YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE MESSING WITH TANKS!".

...Assault, Medic, Support, Engineer (for the most part), and Sniper all have to run from Tanks when they come into a direct contact. At least you have the ability to sneak up on one and render him useless. Be happy that Spec Ops even gets to dabble in the roles of other kits, because it doesn't work that way for anyone else.

{WP}Paas

from ur logic, If I need to hammer a nail into a wall, and I happened not to have a hammer by my side, all I have is a piece of brick, I shouldn't use the brick to hammer the nail in because the brick is for building buildings, not for hammering nails.
if they make it so that c4 can't blow up armors, then it's not mean to take out armors. Since c4 has the ability to take out armors, Specops IS responsible to take out one if he has the chance.
Further more im taking specops as example because it's the most affected kit by this no jump n shooting change. All the other infantry classes have been affected by this more or less in different situations.

[C4Whore4Eva]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

lol i love these idiots keep saying I loved the "exploit" when I suggested another way to fix air-bursting c4. u dont deserve to post in a forum.

Agreed. I also love in when I'm called a whiner, while its these same people that "whined" loud enough that EA was forced to do something about it.

They've even admitted it, they couldn't stand being dominated by SpecOps (after all isn't that what it boils down too? You guys would get dominated, and then whine that C4 is too powerful).

I mean in retrospect, you can make a whole range of (very valid) logical arguements (like Talus ~ which I thought was the best one so far). But the fact of the matter still remains that, people cried about the fact we dominated, and EA did something about.

Sorta like the small fixes Valve adds to CS to counter AWP whores (for the sake of victims).

[Talus]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

Seems like both sides don't seem to really be 'getting' each other's points here...

Spec-Ops can STILL BLOW UP TANKS! (oh and everything else in the game too) It's not like that ability has been removed altogether..sheseh!

[{wxc}panda]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

Seems like both sides don't seem to really be 'getting' each other's points here...

Spec-Ops can STILL BLOW UP TANKS! (oh and everything else in the game too) It's not like that ability has been removed altogether..sheseh!

planes can still fly
guns can still fire


all is good, group hug any1?

[Talus]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

umm...

/hug?

[Blud]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

You place C4, you place mines! Period--the ability to throw them should have never been there in the first place. Now that you can't EXPLOIT anymore it you whine. You have 3 options now--don't play Specops/use c4, play and quit crying about it or just quit playing.

[Dynamic]

Re: SPECOPS-Retarded

You should install the patch first. Thats why you can still throw over the fence.

i didnt mention anything about a fence. also i have the patch installed. i do think that the fence on karkand in this picture should be able to be cleared, and it is a shame they made it so u cant.