is it me or is SF a lil more crowded with 60 players. i do love sf and right now like it more than reg bf2 but when you get over 40 players in a server it just feels too crowded. the maps are a bit smaller i think
-
-
Re: 60 players too many?
Well I generally like the games that are crowded with constant fighting. I don't like rolling around in a jeep, capping points the whole game, though that's often what I'm forced to do due to teammates who won't leave a certain area (Karkand especially).
Too crowded? Not in my opinion. -
Re: 60 players too many?
I think it can be, sometimes you just get fed up with not knowing where any fire is coming from, especially when you get a map full of snipers it can get annoying, BUT saying that some of my best fights have been on crowded maps
Too crowded? - Depends who's playing and what classes!Comment
-
Re: 60 players too many?
Never!!! I love the intensity of the SF maps. The more the merrier! Is it just me though? It seems that there are hardly any SF servers up anymore and the ones that are up are all sized at less than 16 players. I don't mind smaller numbers of players, but I always prefer larger maps.Comment
-
Re: 60 players too many?
60 players isn't too many for maps that are on 64 or 32, maybe for 16 as well. It just adds the intensity of the battle even moreComment
-
Re: 60 players too many?
Id love to see BF2 have 150 players like Joint Operations Typhoon Rising has.
There are some features from JOTR/JOE has that i would love to see BF2 have.
Like ability to select ammo, bodyarmor, be able to move inside helicopters and armored vehicles, be able to select primary and secondary weapons, how much ammo and grenades you take etc.Comment
Comment