Is the map size equivalent to the speed of game?

[longgone]

Do 16 person maps complete faster than 32 and 64 person maps, if they have the same population percentage (ergo 90% full)?

[Ghost-MOH-]

Re: Is the map size equivalent to the speed of game?

What do you mean by complete. I assume you are talking about ticket numbers.

I think ticket numbers depend on map size. The smaller the map the lower the tickets, meaning a quicker game.

[longgone]

Re: Is the map size equivalent to the speed of game?

not exactly, I am actually talking about consumption of tickets (till the game is over), do the 16 person maps play end faster?

[Gillian Anderson]

Re: Is the map size equivalent to the speed of game?

Its all relative.

Yes i have found that the smaller maps are a lot quicker than the larger ones. The small maps tend to last 15 min (give or take a couple minutes). However, the scares are usually a lot lower. So a larger map will yield more time and higher scores. So i would say the time to point ratio would be the same.

Thats just in case you were looking for an easy way to get quick points.

[Seal]

Re: Is the map size equivalent to the speed of game?

not exactly, I am actually talking about consumption of tickets (till the game is over), do the 16 person maps play end faster?

For me, a 16 player server with a 16 player map end in 5 to 10 minutes while a full 64player server can last up to half an hour if your lucky.

So yes, 16 player maps ends faster.

[Alcorr]

Re: Is the map size equivalent to the speed of game?

I find 64 player maps end even faster...even with less tickets...this is because arty kill more ppl per umm launch...jets kill more people....more people just die...its not proportionate to the map size....