Hi Soldiers,
This is my first post here, so please be mild if this has been asked before.
A lot of you guys have some great system rigs to run BF2 in all its glory, but is that a real advantage in the field? What i'm trying to say is, that some people with lesser systems have to use lower settings, Like the "Terrain" for example.
In this case you'll have less foilage while other people (who have this setting set to high) will see more grass.
IMO it's the guy with the lesser config (or the one who has lowered this setting) has the advantage to see the enemy quicker, because the one playing with high settings thinks he's hiding in the grass, but isn't?
Is this true, has anyone tested this? What video options should be lowered. What are the best video options to see the enemy the fastest. (except for the drawing distance)
and yes, I know the site http://www.tweakguides.com/ for using the best options, but I was curious what you guy's think.
Cheers!
This is my first post here, so please be mild if this has been asked before.
A lot of you guys have some great system rigs to run BF2 in all its glory, but is that a real advantage in the field? What i'm trying to say is, that some people with lesser systems have to use lower settings, Like the "Terrain" for example.
In this case you'll have less foilage while other people (who have this setting set to high) will see more grass.
IMO it's the guy with the lesser config (or the one who has lowered this setting) has the advantage to see the enemy quicker, because the one playing with high settings thinks he's hiding in the grass, but isn't?
Is this true, has anyone tested this? What video options should be lowered. What are the best video options to see the enemy the fastest. (except for the drawing distance)
and yes, I know the site http://www.tweakguides.com/ for using the best options, but I was curious what you guy's think.
Cheers!
Comment