I often think about why EA and all you people out there worry so much about stat padding, but expect them to fix the bugs in the game. EA spends so much time on stat padding it's funny, they waste their time AND money doing it, because it takes people to sit there and reset accounts which doesnt lead to fixing game bugs or glitches and that causes wasted money on the employee. If you want the bugs fixed, I suggest we not worry so much about stat padding, besides whos bussiness is it to konw what other people are doing with THEIR OWN COPY of the game that they payed just as much for as you. You actually care who's number 1 but you call them losers because they spend so much time playing, and then you bitch about them stat padding because it 'takes away your gaming experience' you know what i say to that, **** IT, and **** you too for worrying about it. So what'll it be folks more bugs, or worrying about whos doing what? Your pick.
-
-
Re: Stat padding vs. Game bugs.
u would think that EA is this big corporation that has a gazillion dollars to work on both these problems
-
Re: Stat padding vs. Game bugs.
Maybe because stat padders like you, (wait, I know you would never do that yourself, right...) make the whole ranking system a joke.Comment
-
Re: Stat padding vs. Game bugs.
ranking system a joke? If that's how you feel, but when you go complaining about why whoever it is in first place is a stat padder and a loser think about it... you yourself are fighting for rank are you not? It's funny when people like you assume that people stat pad and blah blah blah. If you guys are so worried about busyting sat padders why not go for the big guys and not the people who barely do it. Now how many of you like bugs? How many of you would rather have the bugs out of the game over stat padding? Why did EA let stat padding even become possible? It's their own fault. They give everybody the tools to do it, and they know that people will. So my question AGAIN bugs or padding, which is more important to you, and why? Don't flame, it just shows how mature you yourself really are.Comment
-
Re: Stat padding vs. Game bugs.
Every ranking system is a joke! I remember from socom 2 there was a kid which ranked his name up with a cheating code and tried to sell it on EBAY. I agree ....it is the game play not your stats that matter. Stats are like a fun side to overall very in depth game.Comment
-
Re: Stat padding vs. Game bugs.
Ea has done their job in my oppinion when they made the game have airpower plus landpower (i.e. airplanes choppers tanks etc...) There are supposed 'whores' for each one. Evary player has their own strength, which is which EA intended, If flyin' aint your thing then hey go drive a tank or shoot somebody... They went to please everybody, and what happens? Well, you take a guess... Just look at these forums. People call baseraping stat padding... are you ****ing kidding me. In a war where are you most likely to go? Oh thats right straight to their strengths to take them out... I dont get this supposed 'community'. Back to it... Bugs or stat padding, which is the REAL issue?Comment
-
Re: Stat padding vs. Game bugs.
What does this "padding" mean...?Comment
-
Re: Stat padding vs. Game bugs.
wow... you can't be serious.Comment
-
Re: Stat padding vs. Game bugs.
I never complained about the stat padders, you're to one who brought it up, so it is something that you're thinking about, and it seems, justifing. I don't know who is in first place, nor do I care, but if a ranking system is going to mean anything, stat padders will have to go, or why bother with the rank system in the first place?Originally posted by HckyDlsstrs
You make it sound like it's an either or situation, like they can't address both problems, they can, and are. How it becames possible? By people who cheat, and don't want to earn anything, it's a mind set the devs don't possess. They build systems, not break them. Maybe it never occured to them that people would be that lame. They look at the system thinking, 'how can we make it better, more fun, make tools that will enhance gameplay'.How many of you would rather have the bugs out of the game over stat padding? Why did EA let stat padding even become possible? It's their own fault.
Not 'how can we screw it up and cheat it,' it's not until some morons get togeter and stab/revive someone for an hour straight that they go 'wow, how lame that someone will spend that much time doing something as repetitive and boring just to whore some points', we better fix this.'Comment
-
Re: Stat padding vs. Game bugs.
u know like when girls pad ther braOriginally posted by RamirezComment
-
Re: Stat padding vs. Game bugs.
Want a rank that means something more than n00b bashing? Go play 21CW or something like a clan where it's socal over pure number gimmicks.Comment
-
Re: Stat padding vs. Game bugs.
:laugh: nice one mate, you just about said what im thinking in a nut-shell, but yer i honestly dont care about stat padding aslong as they dont interuppt my gaming i couldnt give a care, i reakon EA should fix the bugs more ,but with EA resting accounts isnt it usaully because of those hacking noobs, they should develop a code which is were if hte game decets taht you have an unfair advantgae IE 'a hack' it auto disables your CDkey/game, i dont know how i would be done but it would be a great idea.. and if someone complains to me about this its properly becasie they use hacks and dont want it to happen :laugh:Comment
-
Re: Stat padding vs. Game bugs.
Well....
EA fixes the padders, PB fixes the Cheaters, and DICE fixes the bugs...
Stop whining about whinersComment
-
Re: Stat padding vs. Game bugs.
stop whining about whiners.. stop whining about me = )Comment
-
Re: Stat padding vs. Game bugs.
blue
hair
apricot
rust
ham
for more random words please donate money to the 'peoples peoples peoples pets liberation of china'.Comment
Comment