OK so i wanna know. I dont go in for mods because it seems that most modders idea of improving the game is to make everything "better".
So you see lists of improvement.
-Made snipers more powerful
-increased range of sniper rifles
-increased tanks armour
-increased x rate of fire
Usually the argument is that its to increase "realism" ... i could write an essay about how most of the "reality" mods are no more realistic than the main game.
Most of the mods seem to leave the balancing to the players.
For example, all guns do almost instant kills with one or two hits. So "players must use now stealth and tact to play the game".
Ive never seen a balanced mod.
Whats the deal???
So you see lists of improvement.
-Made snipers more powerful
-increased range of sniper rifles
-increased tanks armour
-increased x rate of fire
Usually the argument is that its to increase "realism" ... i could write an essay about how most of the "reality" mods are no more realistic than the main game.
Most of the mods seem to leave the balancing to the players.
For example, all guns do almost instant kills with one or two hits. So "players must use now stealth and tact to play the game".
Ive never seen a balanced mod.
Whats the deal???

Comment