Anti-Tank

[Layzan]

Has anyone noticed a huge increase in players using anti tank kit?

[FM_Echo_One]

Re: Anti-Tank

Not really. Seems the same to me.

[imported_illuzion]

Re: Anti-Tank

I have actually noticed an increase...Probably do to either more new players entering the game or people working on expert antitank like myself...Thats the only reason I will play antitank...Its such a bad kit...Its nessecary yet unrewarding at the same time...

[vulcan]

Re: Anti-Tank

Its such a bad kit...Its nessecary yet unrewarding at the same time...

You must be playing it wrong then. The DAO-12 unlock is a man eater of a weapon and the ERYX/SRAW can not only kill armour but completley destroy light vehicles and infantry. DAO-12 at close range is unmatched except for the n00b tube.

Nothing gives me more satisfaction than to kill a sniper with an AT rocket from a long distance.

[JarEme]

Re: Anti-Tank

Yes, AT is easily the 3rd (2nd on a vehicle heavy map like Songhua) best for those reason. It decimates everything.

[JonnyMacFred102]

Re: Anti-Tank

More and more tank noobs are breeding, so more and more AT people will come to counter that.

[Warbird_7]

Re: Anti-Tank

Well, as the BF2 community's tactics change, so will the number of people attempting to counter it. A surge in anti-tanks probably indicates an increasing number of players using tanks. Not that I blame them; tanks can completely own a battlefield under certain circumstances.

[Digital-Boy]

Re: Anti-Tank

I've seen more AT guys since v1.03, probably since so many people unlocked the DAO-12 since then.

When I first unlocked the DAO-12, I was thinking, "Sucks for all those chumps who won't ever think to unlock the DAO-12.":evil:

Now everyone has it. >_> Jokes on me, I guess.

[Slapidus]

Re: Anti-Tank

Ive notice it to,alot more anti-tank,which is good and bad i guess,good for the team bad for the tank whores lol