i was wondering which game i should get. please say what you think, i cant make up my mind. i mean which game should i get next?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
BF2:SF vs. F.E.A.R. vs Quake 4
Collapse
X
-
Re: BF2:SF vs. F.E.A.R. vs Quake 4
That depends....FEAR and Quake 4 both have really stale same old small map death match multiplayer, with fun that lasts about 3 min. Single player for both games is really fun...however, do you think you'll play single player again after beating it in one weekend?
Whatever, BF2:SF may have a lot of bugs and it should have been included in the original BF2...but no matter how much you hate EA...which one do you think will last you?
-
Re: BF2:SF vs. F.E.A.R. vs Quake 4
I pick f.e.a.r., it's all in personal preference battlechimp, i just played the mp demo for an hour and i thought i'd been playing for 10 minutes. While i know how much i'm playing bf2...
i love fear. can't wait for full game.
Comment
-
Re: BF2:SF vs. F.E.A.R. vs Quake 4
also with F.E.A.R. i will mostly be playing MP since i dont really like scary stuff, like scary movies, i might like scary games. but ive been playing the mp demo and its really fun and it runs smooth on med-low, but with quake 4 i dont think i will ike the mp, i hear its like quake 3 and ive never played it and i dont think i will like it. also i will most likely get BF2:SF no matter what so its really just quake 4 or FEAR.
Comment
-
Re: BF2:SF vs. F.E.A.R. vs Quake 4
Quake 4..the multiplayer is what sold me on it, but I found the single player just as fun, especially if you like faster paced games. To me F.E.A.R. is a little boring and seems like Max Payne in first person. I'm not too sure about the BF2 expansion yet...I know very little about it so I cant make a judgement on it just yet.
Comment
-
Re: BF2:SF vs. F.E.A.R. vs Quake 4
Quake 4 is better overall with its multiplayer, while fears sinlge player owns all.....and sf might be good...might not. If theres many exploits and glitches....which there will be, then it will suck fo a few months till they patch it all.
Comment
-
Re: BF2:SF vs. F.E.A.R. vs Quake 4
Originally posted by SmilingRaccoonQuake 4 is better overall with its multiplayer, while fears sinlge player owns all.....and sf might be good...might not. If theres many exploits and glitches....which there will be, then it will suck fo a few months till they patch it all.
Comment
-
Re: BF2:SF vs. F.E.A.R. vs Quake 4
Originally posted by alecs36How is Quake4 online better? I thought it was just the same old run n gun fast.
Comment
-
Re: BF2:SF vs. F.E.A.R. vs Quake 4
Originally posted by BattleChimpThat depends....FEAR and Quake 4 both have really stale same old small map death match multiplayer, with fun that lasts about 3 min. Single player for both games is really fun...however, do you think you'll play single player again after beating it in one weekend?
Whatever, BF2:SF may have a lot of bugs and it should have been included in the original BF2...but no matter how much you hate EA...which one do you think will last you?
totaly agreed, i hate fear and q4 mutliplayer.......
Comment
Comment