This is BF2 but with better graphics

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Guidon666

    #91
    Re: This is BF2 but with better graphics

    Originally posted by TriggerHappy2005
    Look it's not a question of getting our asses kicked but that we are in an un-winnable situation. Nobody likes to admit to it but we made a bad situation worse and we keep saying that the Iraqis have to pony up and it just aint gonna happen. It's obvious going forward that "regime change" never works (look at Vietnam). Lastly politics is why we're in this mess to begin with not because our country was at risk.
    Agreed.

    Comment

    • TriggerHappy2005

      #92
      Re: This is BF2 but with better graphics

      I agree with you there that we should mount up and head stateside.

      Comment

      • TriggerHappy2005

        #93
        Re: This is BF2 but with better graphics

        Guidon666, after reading your edited post I apologize and aside from that I think I was being a little too harsh nonetheless. Sorry, Trigger.

        Comment

        • Earnhardt

          #94
          Re: This is BF2 but with better graphics

          This footage can really change a persons outlook on life. I'm glad people share stuff like this, it shows how bad it really is over there. Makes you rethink all those petty little things you complained about in the past.

          Comment

          • Guidon666

            #95
            Re: This is BF2 but with better graphics

            Dude.... No worries.... caught up in the moment. (Pretty silly to do on the net)

            No need to apologize as we both have opinions and they often differ. However... accepted as well as offered in return.

            Comment

            • Megahurtz

              #96
              Re: This is BF2 but with better graphics

              Dude that wouldnt be fun at all, that would be hell, I'd hate to have to fight in the arm Thanks to all the guiys who fight for our freedom!!
              THANK YOU!!

              Comment

              • murt

                #97
                Re: This is BF2 but with better graphics

                Originally posted by 12-RST-
                None of the Allies had an extensive history at arnhem during WW2 Cause the Nazis won that one. And if we didn't step in that conflict, I GD guarantee you, your ignorant @$$ would be speaking German.
                Hello 12-RST-,

                when you say 'step-in', do you mean when you stepped in militarily, or when you stepped in to appropriate the erstwhile British Empire - and to fund the war on both sides?

                Militarily, you waited until the tide of the German war-machine had been turned, and you should try and find a copy of an old book titled 'The Black Bull' - to see just how much use the US army was on the field. We were fighting for our freedom - you were fighting for lugers and Iron crosses.

                Specifically, Montgomery's plans for Arnhem were scuppered by two U.S. generals - I'm sure you know which two.

                regds, murt.

                Comment

                • mrbucket

                  #98
                  Re: This is BF2 but with better graphics

                  Originally posted by guidon666
                  Uh...

                  I recall setting my troop TOC in Fallujah April 2003. So check your years it might be a typo or simple missinformation.

                  It would also be really hard to explain to my soldiers families who died in Fallujah... in April, July, and Aug of 2003 if we were not there until 2004. Not to mention my BSV dated June 2003 for actions in Fallujah.

                  Here is a link to the 1st firing incident at one of our troop TOCs in Fallujah, dated 29 April 2003.

                  Watch full episodes of your favorite PBS dramas, find in-depth news analysis and explore documentaries on history, science, art and more!


                  Hard to be shot at at your HQ if your HQ wasnt there.

                  and here is a simple link to a Unit paper that was being sent home to the families from the time (May 2003) 2nd topic was one of the Cav troops in Fallujah.
                  http://www.3acr.com/DR%20Issue%201.pdf
                  I'm sorry, my dates are bad, god time flies. 2003 not 2004.

                  Comment

                  • Guidon666

                    #99
                    Re: This is BF2 but with better graphics

                    Originally posted by mrbucket
                    I'm sorry, my dates are bad, god time flies. 2003 not 2004.
                    :)

                    Ultimately I figured it might have been a typo.

                    Comment

                    • OMGWTFBBQ

                      #100
                      Re: This is BF2 but with better graphics

                      Tank Whore!


                      Are these USMC or US Army soldiers?

                      Comment

                      • jimbob

                        #101
                        Re: This is BF2 but with better graphics

                        Originally posted by 12-RST-
                        Rgr that, and according to how minimal your thinking capacity is, you could most definately elaborate on this phrase.
                        hahahaha i think you have elaborated yourself into enough crap already lol

                        Comment

                        • jimbob

                          #102
                          Re: This is BF2 but with better graphics

                          Originally posted by TriggerHappy2005
                          None of the Allies had an extensive history at arnhem during WW2 Cause the Nazis won that one. And if we didn't step in that conflict, I GD guarantee you, your ignorant @$$ would be speaking German. Take your pathetic self to Waldens or whatever bookstores they have on your planet and pick up the Road to Arnhem, then obtain some appreication for what my evil nation of infidels has tried to do to make this a better planet for very1, including the haters.

                          12-RST- I respect your opinion but I have to disagree with you on this. WWII was an obvious threat to our national security while Saddam Hussein is and was NOT. Now as for the arguement that we removed an evil dictator, our world is full of them not the least of which is China with whom we do business with. So are we to believe that removing an "evil dictator" was worth "currently" 2000 American and 25000+ Iraqi lives and untold billions of dollars. If you buy into that rationale than you are a fool. I have the utmost respect for our soldiers and our military but just because they are involved in a conflict does'nt mean that conflict is one we should be involved in. It is the responsibility of our government and the American people to decide when to use that force. Basically separate the war from the warrior is what I'm saying. And if you believe that if we dont fight the Iraqi insurgents (Iraqi civilian population) over there than we'll have to fight them over here, then you are a serious fool. Trigger.

                          you are the most rational american i have ever heard. please tell me there are more people over there like you who understand the difference between patriotism and blind devotion...

                          Comment

                          • mlkmnz

                            #103
                            Re: This is BF2 but with better graphics

                            Originally posted by Deez
                            Hehe. Clowns. Now I know why the US forces expend 250 000 rounds for each Iraqi 'Insurgent' killed.......

                            Comment

                            • 12-RST-

                              #104
                              Re: This is BF2 but with better graphics

                              Those would be Army, can tell by the shoulder insigs and the uhhh Bradley, USMC don't have Bradleys in the real world. And whoever made the last post, 250,000 per insurgent, LMAO, do you know that each soldier/marine carries 210 rounds into a battle? do you know how long and how many guns it would take to fire 250,000 rounds in a day? And Believe me, the insurgents expend way more rounds, 1. because they dont maintain thier weapons because they are untrained mule's asses, and 2. they fire thier weapons like thier popping caps with 2pac in Juice.

                              Comment

                              • 12-RST-

                                #105
                                Re: This is BF2 but with better graphics

                                Monty's plans for Arnhem if you wanna call em that, are what killed almost 8,000 of the Polish 1st airborne Brigade before they even hit the ground and had the British 1st div. surrounded ready to be obliterated until the 101st crossed the lower rhine river seperating the rest of the allied forces from Arnhem to sneak them out by boat. I'm sure you DON'T KNOW the complete story and you're confused. I suggest you read the road to Arnhem and elaborate once you have done so.

                                Comment

                                Working...