Re: Would anyone be interested in a Last Man Standing event?
Sniping is all about waiting.
If there were enough participants, and if we had a 32 man server(unranked of course) If we couldn't make it every man for himself, we could:
Randomize teams 16v16
Top 10 from winning team, and top 6 from losing team(you can't DQ someone for being on a bad team).
Top 5 from winning team, and top 3 from losing team
Top 2 from each side have a 1v1 best of 3 rounds in a 16 man map.
Two winners battle in the format above.
It would also be kinda fun with grenade launchers as the other guy said, I never really thought of that. There would need to be some way to get them ammo, but not enough to wher ethey can just go around everywhere and shoot. Strategy is the name of the game.
I wouldn't really need/want to be the leader, it's just an idea. If someone else wants to take inititive, make the rules, manage a server, and all the rest, be my guest.
Sniping is all about waiting.
If there were enough participants, and if we had a 32 man server(unranked of course) If we couldn't make it every man for himself, we could:
Randomize teams 16v16
Top 10 from winning team, and top 6 from losing team(you can't DQ someone for being on a bad team).
Top 5 from winning team, and top 3 from losing team
Top 2 from each side have a 1v1 best of 3 rounds in a 16 man map.
Two winners battle in the format above.
It would also be kinda fun with grenade launchers as the other guy said, I never really thought of that. There would need to be some way to get them ammo, but not enough to wher ethey can just go around everywhere and shoot. Strategy is the name of the game.
I wouldn't really need/want to be the leader, it's just an idea. If someone else wants to take inititive, make the rules, manage a server, and all the rest, be my guest.
Comment