I don't yet own BF2 but am considering getting it. I have a couple of questions about the game itself;
1) I wasn't particularly impressed with a demo I played of this game before BF2 was released. The graphics were only so-so and I found it too 'arcadey'. Regardless of the weapon, you would sometimes need several headshots before dropping them. It seemed too much like there was a certain number of bullets needed to kill an enemy, which is not very realistic. Since the game has come out, the graphics look far better, however could someone who owns it tell me how they find its level of damage realism? Will a sniper's bullet to the head now drop an opponent in one?
2) I've heard a lot about TKs with regards to BF2. It's a problem you often come across in any MP game, but as a game that is based mainly in MP form, how much of a problem have players found it to be in relation to other MP games? Better, worse or no difference?
1) I wasn't particularly impressed with a demo I played of this game before BF2 was released. The graphics were only so-so and I found it too 'arcadey'. Regardless of the weapon, you would sometimes need several headshots before dropping them. It seemed too much like there was a certain number of bullets needed to kill an enemy, which is not very realistic. Since the game has come out, the graphics look far better, however could someone who owns it tell me how they find its level of damage realism? Will a sniper's bullet to the head now drop an opponent in one?
2) I've heard a lot about TKs with regards to BF2. It's a problem you often come across in any MP game, but as a game that is based mainly in MP form, how much of a problem have players found it to be in relation to other MP games? Better, worse or no difference?
Comment