because nowbody reads, here is the real commander score system
in the other thread people keep saying the same things and they are not correct, I have tested many things and here it is.
Would it be the average of all the players ?? NO
I was playing commander on a 16 player server running a 32 player map, after some time, I was second of my team having 55 points, first one had like 60 points, the other ones like 20 - 45 points,wasn't the average at all.
Would it be kills with artilery or anything else , or maybe how much you use UAV and stuff ?? NO
Because I tested the folowing, was commander, didn't do absolutely anything and I got a very nice commander score, just because my team did good.
The commander score is depending on the flag capturing, when your team captures a flag, you won't get the point directly, you have to keep the flag for some time, then you get the point, keeping flags gives you points to, but less then capturing flags.
This is why you get so many and so easy points as a commander if there aren't many players on the map, they don't kill much ut capture many flags.
Because people don't read every page of a thread (don't do it always myself) I have edited my first post here and posted the proof (screenshots + calculation) also here in the first post. NOT THE AVERAGE GUYS!!!!!!
OK, I took the screens and under every screen I have the average, would It be the average or not ? lets see...
I will do two calculations, one with the negative scores and one without, I do not count myself in, because this would be stupid, calculating an average with the so called average
First screen, start of the game, gettng my first commander point.
16 players - myself is 15 players.
4+4+2+2+2+1-5-6-6 = -2 -2 / 15 = -0.3 so this way it isn't my score at all, my curent score is 1 and it actualy should be negative.
Now without the negative scores.
4+4+2+2+2+1 = 15 15 / 15 = 1
This could be it people !!!
Second image , here I have 4 commander points
Still 16 players
now we have 10+8+6+6+6+4+4+4+3+2-6-7 = 40 40 / 15 = 2.6 points , this isn't my curent score, my curent score is 4 , now without the negative points.
10+8+6+6+6+4+4+4+3+2 = 53 53 / 15 = 3.5 but 3.5 is actualy 4
Third image , here I have 11 commander points
Still 16 players and one major moron gettng -24 points
now we have 21+20+16+15+15+10+10+10+8+8+6-6-24= 109 109 / 15 = 7.3 not my score, curent score is 11 , without the negative scores.
21+20+16+15+15+10+10+10+8+8+6 = 139 139 / 15 = 9.3 so here we are going of track because we are 2 points short.
Fourth image, here I have 20 commander points
Still 16 players and the moron with -25 points.
Now we have 49+26+22+20+19+19+18+14+12+8+8-25 = 190 190 / 15 = 12.6 points , so we have 7 points short.
Without the negative score
49+26+22+20+19+19+18+14+12+8+8 = 215 215 / 15 = 14.3 meaning 6 points short .
So it can be something with the average but not completely , my team sucked like hel and we lost the game, I think if my team did realy good caping flags I would have a bigger score.
One thing is for shure, if it has to do with the average, well the negative scores don't count.
Also tried counting my own score in it, didn't work ether.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would it be the average of all the players ?? NO
I was playing commander on a 16 player server running a 32 player map, after some time, I was second of my team having 55 points, first one had like 60 points, the other ones like 20 - 45 points,wasn't the average at all.
Would it be kills with artilery or anything else , or maybe how much you use UAV and stuff ?? NO
Because I tested the folowing, was commander, didn't do absolutely anything and I got a very nice commander score, just because my team did good.
The commander score is depending on the flag capturing, when your team captures a flag, you won't get the point directly, you have to keep the flag for some time, then you get the point, keeping flags gives you points to, but less then capturing flags.
This is why you get so many and so easy points as a commander if there aren't many players on the map, they don't kill much ut capture many flags.
Because people don't read every page of a thread (don't do it always myself) I have edited my first post here and posted the proof (screenshots + calculation) also here in the first post. NOT THE AVERAGE GUYS!!!!!!
OK, I took the screens and under every screen I have the average, would It be the average or not ? lets see...
I will do two calculations, one with the negative scores and one without, I do not count myself in, because this would be stupid, calculating an average with the so called average
First screen, start of the game, gettng my first commander point.
16 players - myself is 15 players.
4+4+2+2+2+1-5-6-6 = -2 -2 / 15 = -0.3 so this way it isn't my score at all, my curent score is 1 and it actualy should be negative.
Now without the negative scores.
4+4+2+2+2+1 = 15 15 / 15 = 1
This could be it people !!!
Second image , here I have 4 commander points
Still 16 players
now we have 10+8+6+6+6+4+4+4+3+2-6-7 = 40 40 / 15 = 2.6 points , this isn't my curent score, my curent score is 4 , now without the negative points.
10+8+6+6+6+4+4+4+3+2 = 53 53 / 15 = 3.5 but 3.5 is actualy 4
Third image , here I have 11 commander points
Still 16 players and one major moron gettng -24 points
now we have 21+20+16+15+15+10+10+10+8+8+6-6-24= 109 109 / 15 = 7.3 not my score, curent score is 11 , without the negative scores.
21+20+16+15+15+10+10+10+8+8+6 = 139 139 / 15 = 9.3 so here we are going of track because we are 2 points short.
Fourth image, here I have 20 commander points
Still 16 players and the moron with -25 points.
Now we have 49+26+22+20+19+19+18+14+12+8+8-25 = 190 190 / 15 = 12.6 points , so we have 7 points short.
Without the negative score
49+26+22+20+19+19+18+14+12+8+8 = 215 215 / 15 = 14.3 meaning 6 points short .
So it can be something with the average but not completely , my team sucked like hel and we lost the game, I think if my team did realy good caping flags I would have a bigger score.
One thing is for shure, if it has to do with the average, well the negative scores don't count.
Also tried counting my own score in it, didn't work ether.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment