BF2 missing classic desert maps we all loved?

[storlied]

DC for example..gave the feeling of the war...US against terrorist...dont get me wrong or flame me for that comment but uhm....the almost all desert maps, i miss them...thats what makes this game seems so....outta place (other than bugs n gameplay problems)...dont you people miss these desert maps...small lil villages out in the desert....or really big urban maps unlike the ones in BF2.... only thing that comes close is Mashtuur City but that doesnt have the right feel to it...i miss like...73 eastings and.. u know all the others alot of us played soo much... lost village was nice......whats your guy's opinions?...what would you like to see ...desert wise...... i think it was cool flyin a jet over over a desert... goin into a town deserted so..dry..hot.. made it seem...now in BF2 its like...crap...lol... so whats ur opinions and thoughts n stuff?...

[storlied]

btw, i know this isnt DC, i know this isnt supposed to be..good guys against bad guys..its supposed to be a future war....dont get me wrong about anything...just an idea...a thought...

[Rambo_Matt[US]]

i liked how the DC maps was really big and they only had 3 outpost it made it alot easier to defend the bases also the planes in it where alot eaiser to controll those are the only things i miss from DC.

[bu11eTJuNkiE]

Have you played Strike at Karkand?

[Nitemare]

Have you played Strike at Karkand?

That's not really desert...but still that's only 1 map. We want more than 1.

[storlied]

yes, strike at karkand and Mashtuur City is as close as any of the maps come...but their just not it.....like #3 said.... large scale desert maps with few outposts
so it seems like a long journey...a lil trip to get place to place...

[WrAth2110]

If you have every played POE for BFV, you know what good maps are all about. Like ones where you can airdrop over cities, and others where are large strech of desert seperates the cities where the flags are. Or how about a map with an up hill battle trying to capture a building at the top of the hill. Fun stuff....

[storlied]

#7, i agree... i loved that mod..

[sra_slimshady]

I think EA said we'll see more desert maps comin up in the expansion, no?

[storlied]

no... lol... i highly doubt it.......main thing in that expansion is gonna be nightmaps n a vast desert map might... be a possibility..but i mean come on...BF2 should have em... its what made DC...in fact..DC... the feel of bein on a desert battlefield fightin iraqi's gave it a more realistic feel to it

[JDUB]

Forget the huge maps..

It's all about infantry combat.

[Murmack]

DC was a better game.
It was brutal and you could actually get into the buildings or operate artillery, fly hard to fly but such pleasing helis etc etc etc, so many things.
I just wait for it to come to bf2.
EA can F\/ck off, bring on the modders.

[Murmack]

Having said that, this is the base game and it is better than vanilla bf42 so i hope the mods like dc will be so much better.
War is brutal and so was dc.
Leave the vanilla to the gamepad players.

[Sauron16]

kinda off topic but storlied how can u soft mod an audigy 1 to audigy 2? they are completely different chipsets. DC was good but walking was a bi-atch

[Guest]

I was wondering that too Sauron.

Back on topic though, the war on terrorism doesn't involve large maps. Why? Well, you mentioned 73 Easting, a map based primarily on armored conflicts. Terrorists don't have tanks. That's just one example.