Citizens on maps?

[dwuf76]

Anyone ever thought about putting inocent citizens as obsticles on maps? In real life and modern warfare they would be around some. Why is always just us and them on maps? Minus points for killing them? thoughts? Discuss!!

[bam23]

No

Because

No

[Jeebus007]

ppl are getting enough negative points due to TKs as it is...we don't need to lose some more just because our tank shell missed an enemy, tore into a house, and killed 6 civvies

plus artillery strikes would become obsolete...that's a good 20 dead civilians there

[C11.Nemisis]

it would cause lag because of the AI being used on the map which will strain the server cpu

[Remy X.O.]

yeah because civilians like to stick around and take nice walks in huge industrial war grounds.

[Fall0ut]

this was done in Americas Army, it stopped grenade spam pretty nicely.

But this is BF2 and civilians wouldn't change much for anyone except choppers and bombers. Blast radius for nades in BF2 is really small.

[[13]VisciousDog]

Media running with the military to get live feeds.

[IHateYou]

Media running with the military to get live feeds.

dibbs on TK'ing Geraldo.

[Drum]

good suggestion but i also say no

would be nice to have civil. vechiles like the game was orginaly going to have... anywayz

[Chenzo]

I actually think it would be cool, but like Nemesis said, they'd have to just be standing around or the AI would crush the game

[Zombie of PizzaRolls]

Are you serious? You actually think people would stand around like ****tards while bombs are going off 10 ft in front of them, and not run away? Plus it would just look plain stupid..

No, just no..o.o

[ynxyg]

ppl are getting enough negative points due to TKs as it is...we don't need to lose some more just because our tank shell missed an enemy, tore into a house, and killed 6 civvies

plus artillery strikes would become obsolete...that's a good 20 dead civilians there

So thats why US kill so many Civils over there in Iraq...



Anyways all you would have to do with Civil AI is just either have them hide in buidings screaming or having running in terror way from the battlefield. After like a first few mins the map will be mostly empty .

[Ice_Man]

The US doesnt use artillery strikes on cities, we use tactical weapons, and we havent killed a lot of civilians, look at other wars, this is a drastic improvement, also look at the other side. Anyhow, I say no because thats just plain stupid, while your laying out cover fire for your squad an idiot walks infront of you and you get - points from it... No, and even if there were civilains running around it'd be like 10 around the whole map, most people in war are hiding, not wandering around for sniper practice. Just my feelings. (They would be fun to run over though)...

[imported_StormForce]

no citizens/periodz

[deceiver]

The US doesnt use artillery strikes on cities, we use tactical weapons, and we havent killed a lot of civilians, look at other wars, this is a drastic improvement, also look at the other side. Anyhow, I say no because thats just plain stupid, while your laying out cover fire for your squad an idiot walks infront of you and you get - points from it... No, and even if there were civilains running around it'd be like 10 around the whole map, most people in war are hiding, not wandering around for sniper practice. Just my feelings. (They would be fun to run over though)...

oh the many times I have heard on the news... X number of civilians dead because the US thought saddam was in X region so they bomb it...only to kill civilians

they just count as collateral dmg to the US >.>