What do you prefer? Leave the arguments out of this thread please, go discuss in the thread in the general section if you want to argue.
-
-
one tank/walker per side in a city is ideal
leave buggies in -
I don't like fighting for what few armor is on the most commonly played maps, but on vehicle heavy maps, I like to take tanks and walkers and attack other armored vehicles. Or gunships, but I suck at flying those.
What I do like is playing engineer on maps like Belgrade and Fall of Berlin and attacking vehicles.Comment
-
More Infantry Only!Comment
-
what i'm saying is that apcs are THE DEVILComment
-
we really dont need to see another version of bf2 do we?Comment
-
I prefer balanced but it would be a good idea if Dice made I/O server side setting for ranked servers but only for certain maps at certain sizes to avoid BF2 I/O mistakes.Comment
-
both,but i little more like infantry.Comment
-
Infantry Only, that's all we need :)Comment
-
I like both equally. Hitting the rear armour of another vehicle with a Tank can be very satisifing, but so can using the Baur to pick of targets.Comment
-
Pilum'ing is one of the most fun things you can do in BF2142... although generally I like the infantry maps more.Comment
-
to me, 2142's balance is about perfect.... when not joining m8s already playing, I prefer the city maps... there are just enough vehicles to break the monotony of I/O... and with the number of ways to take a vehicle down (railguns, much more flexible kits) IMO there doesn't need to be an I/O setting.Comment
-
I don't even play vehicle maps at all. Cerbere Landing or Camp G only! (Maybe a little Tuna Harbor)Comment
-
It is perfect as it is. This game was made for the infantry fans out there. BF2 is like 15 bux. Go get yourself a J10 or a tank with a commander dropping supply boxes and you will be set for life.Comment
-
We currently have no infantry only... We need some. Not even FAVs as those get whored way to often.Comment
Comment