No it didnt. There were DLCs you purchased for all the Battlefield games except Vietnam.
Crunch
This and there has been DLC sold for plenty of other games in the past too. I believe some members seem to only remember what they want to about the Battlefield series.
almost all DLC will always cost money. Its a trend started in the call of duty series.
DLC has been around allot longer than COD, they were just called expansion packs and gave us allot more content...................I have absolutely no problem with paying a developer for their work, especially when the maps will be populated. The byproduct of BF2's "carrot dangling" rank system was a decimated user created map playerbase so paying even $5 per map is a deal when you can be assured of a community there to play on them and developers to patch or tweak them as needed.
I''ll bet doughnuts to dollars there will be a WW2 "expansion pack" for BF3, somewhere around 6 months after release, I just don't see them letting all the work put into it go to waste.....atleast we can use the Thompson, M1911 and M1 (still needs a bayonet) in BFBC2.....lolz
screw that, i want a full blown WWII BF game after BF3, none of that DLC crap with just few maps.
My how we have come almost full circle. Not to long ago people were screaming and whining, we are tired of WW2 games we want modern warfare games. And that is what we have. Why go back to a genera that played itself out?
I played the hell out of 1943 on the PS3, you're not missing much the same maps get tiresome after awhile and the flying only map is only good a couple of times.
Comment