NO! It's Another Tactic.

[CptainCrunch]

<img src="http://images.totalgamingnetwork.com/potd/bc2tactic.jpg" alt="" border="0" />

[Swatpll]

Re: NO! It's Another Tactic.

rrolff

[jake_]

Re: NO! It's Another Tactic.

hahaha jihad uav anyone?

[foxyman]

Re: NO! It's Another Tactic.

that will take out a m-com easily, are they changing that in the final release?

[Dangerdog]

Re: NO! It's Another Tactic.

that will take out a m-com easily, are they changing that in the final release?

suppose to take double the amount of C4, so 12 instead of 6.

have to wait and see if the same holds true for engineers land mines.

[jimykx]

Re: NO! It's Another Tactic.

have to wait and see if the same holds true for engineers land mines.

nevah tried that.

[groundedzero]

Re: NO! It's Another Tactic.

Hehe cheaky

[ShadowX8001]

Re: NO! It's Another Tactic.

Fine with me if it takes 12 pieces. Teams still won't actually DEFEND the cases. If people actually DEFENDEDDDDD the damn case c4 wouldn't be an issue at all. And I know.

[*FMJ*Power]

Re: NO! It's Another Tactic.

tactic or waste of a valuable team asset........depends on what kind of player you are i guess. The UAV should not respawn for 10 minutes after its destroyed.......that would discourage this "tactic"

[CptainCrunch]

Re: NO! It's Another Tactic.

tactic or waste of a valuable team asset........depends on what kind of player you are i guess. The UAV should not respawn for 10 minutes after its destroyed.......that would discourage this "tactic"

Thats the current issue is that the C4 wont destroy the UAV. They can send it back and do it again.

The MCOM fixes should stop it though, hopefully.

Crunch

[Mavrik347]

Re: NO! It's Another Tactic.

Pfft, I wouldn't mind if the enemy tried that. It's valid and the UAV is easy to shoot down when it only takes 1 shot and OMGWTFBOOMBANG C4 EXPLOSION.


IMO The power of C4 and land mines was fine in the BETA. I mean it took a team to get a Recon dude in safely with a load of C4. So... I thought that was the idea? Promote teamwork? And Land mines can be spotted and destroyed from miles away. They were fine!

[jake_]

Re: NO! It's Another Tactic.

Thats the current issue is that the C4 wont destroy the UAV. They can send it back and do it again.

The MCOM fixes should stop it though, hopefully.

Crunch

The odds of someone being able to pilot a UAV loaded with C4 multiple times to different M-COMs without it being shotdown seems nigh impossible.

[CptainCrunch]

Re: NO! It's Another Tactic.

The odds of someone being able to pilot a UAV loaded with C4 multiple times to different M-COMs without it being shotdown seems nigh impossible.

Yeah, youd think. I saw it happen once. It was a stacked server of about 8 clansmen on one side and us on the other. What they didnt destroy with the UAV they did by coordinated tactics against us poor noobs.

Ahhhh, Battlefield, how I missed you.

Crunch

[Vreki]

Re: NO! It's Another Tactic.

Fine with me if it takes 12 pieces. Teams still won't actually DEFEND the cases. If people actually DEFENDEDDDDD the damn case c4 wouldn't be an issue at all. And I know.

That would require 2-3 people sitting on their *** near each M-COM for the whole game. The reason nobody does this is that it is boring as hell.

[di di MAU]

Re: NO! It's Another Tactic.

That would require 2-3 people sitting on their *** near each M-COM for the whole game. The reason nobody does this is that it is boring as hell.

unless you're in my ventrilo... nothing is ever boring. If it already takes the efforts of two people to blow up the MCOMs with a jihad UAV (OB) then why do people think that three people sharing like mindedness is out of the question? It's like doublemint gum... times three... with explosives.