My take on BF1943

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Harry Halfcock
    Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 1

    #1

    My take on BF1943

    Baffled, or perhaps bemused would describe my reaction to reading the plethora or reviews for Battlefield 1943.

    Here is a game that offers even less than its diminutive size would suggest averaging a rating of 8 out of 10. The reviewers seem to be admitting that the game offers nothing new, that the graphics are not that great, that the sounds are ok and that there is limited gameplay value, but wait, It’s download only content therefore the graphics are brilliant, the sounds are wonderful and the massive selection of 3 whole maps sets some kind of precedent for generosity. Being DLC, it seems that the bar against which this game is judged is set a lot, lot lower.

    I supposed I may be spoilt coming from the PC gaming market where a full game costs in the region of £20-25, it feels to me like I’m getting less than a quarter of the content for half the price. I suppose it’s not such a bad proposition to the console gaming crowd, who get stung for twice the amount for new games than their PC gaming brethren.

    The graphics are certainly nothing to write home about, certainly some improvement over Battlefield 2, but not much, and nothing to write home about in 2009. There is still a cartoonish element to the visuals, the tanks and planes look like caricatures of their real life counterparts.

    Gameplay is of the genre run around like a headless chicken with the trigger held down like some sort of digital Rambo. Every level plays the same; there are no tactics and nothing to inspire teamwork. All the assets seem to respawn in femtoseconds, so it hardly seems worth destroying them. You take on a tank head on, tanks which incidentally can be destroyed by the use of harsh language or an offensively loud shirt, only to get shot then respawn and have to take on the same tank again and again and again.

    In conclusion, if you are in the habit of spontaneously throwing ten pound notes down drains, at tramps or in rivers you may as well waste some more money on this game, play it for an hour, get bored and delete it from your hard drive forever. If you have the attention span of a knat, you may also enjoy this game. I would imagine EA/dice will bring several more instalments, ending up with something resembling a full game but at twice the price, but hey it’s only Microsoft Points right, it not like it’s real money. In terms of entertainment per £, I would have been better off with a couple of cinema tickets, or if you haven’t played it, Battlefield2 with all the add-ons is now available for much less than a tenner.

    I’m now off to go sob in the corner for having spent £10 on what in times gone by may have been called a demo. Such is progress.
    4 out of 10
  • Kylee!
    Member
    • Apr 2007
    • 4161

    #2
    Re: My take on BF1943

    Originally posted by Harry Halfcock
    Baffled, or perhaps bemused would describe my reaction to reading the plethora or reviews for Battlefield 1943.

    Here is a game that offers even less than its diminutive size would suggest averaging a rating of 8 out of 10. The reviewers seem to be admitting that the game offers nothing new, that the graphics are not that great, that the sounds are ok and that there is limited gameplay value, but wait, It’s download only content therefore the graphics are brilliant, the sounds are wonderful and the massive selection of 3 whole maps sets some kind of precedent for generosity. Being DLC, it seems that the bar against which this game is judged is set a lot, lot lower.

    I supposed I may be spoilt coming from the PC gaming market where a full game costs in the region of £20-25, it feels to me like I’m getting less than a quarter of the content for half the price. I suppose it’s not such a bad proposition to the console gaming crowd, who get stung for twice the amount for new games than their PC gaming brethren.

    The graphics are certainly nothing to write home about, certainly some improvement over Battlefield 2, but not much, and nothing to write home about in 2009. There is still a cartoonish element to the visuals, the tanks and planes look like caricatures of their real life counterparts.

    Gameplay is of the genre run around like a headless chicken with the trigger held down like some sort of digital Rambo. Every level plays the same; there are no tactics and nothing to inspire teamwork. All the assets seem to respawn in femtoseconds, so it hardly seems worth destroying them. You take on a tank head on, tanks which incidentally can be destroyed by the use of harsh language or an offensively loud shirt, only to get shot then respawn and have to take on the same tank again and again and again.

    In conclusion, if you are in the habit of spontaneously throwing ten pound notes down drains, at tramps or in rivers you may as well waste some more money on this game, play it for an hour, get bored and delete it from your hard drive forever. If you have the attention span of a knat, you may also enjoy this game. I would imagine EA/dice will bring several more instalments, ending up with something resembling a full game but at twice the price, but hey it’s only Microsoft Points right, it not like it’s real money. In terms of entertainment per £, I would have been better off with a couple of cinema tickets, or if you haven’t played it, Battlefield2 with all the add-ons is now available for much less than a tenner.

    I’m now off to go sob in the corner for having spent £10 on what in times gone by may have been called a demo. Such is progress.
    4 out of 10
    Well graphics wise... I'm thinking DICE went for an authentic 1942 look more than a realistic one meaning. The graphics are supposed to look like that.

    And as the graphics looking a bit better than BF2? Thats a huge understatement. The graphics look ages better, especially for a console game (Xbox 360 came out how many years ago?), the lighting is beautiful, more details, and the fact that everything is destructible... makes it all quite amazing compared to other games.

    Although I do agree with your aspect on gameplay however, I didn't find it that amazing.

    Comment

    • Minmaster
      I DON'T PLAY CS!
      • Nov 2006
      • 4112

      #3
      Re: My take on BF1943

      question: do destroyed buildings re-spawn into fresh ones?

      Comment

      • Kylee!
        Member
        • Apr 2007
        • 4161

        #4
        Re: My take on BF1943

        Originally posted by Minmaster
        question: do destroyed buildings re-spawn into fresh ones?
        In the middle of a match? No.

        Comment

        • Minmaster
          I DON'T PLAY CS!
          • Nov 2006
          • 4112

          #5
          Re: My take on BF1943

          hmm then if some guy decides to get in a tank and just go around blowing up buildings down to the foundation in the beginning of the game, there won't be buildings to use for cover for infantry until the game ends?

          it sounds like tanks will be very powerful since infantry relies on cover which can be easily destroyed by them. although i'm curious to see how many shots it will take to destroy buildings.

          Comment

          • MrKLM
            Member
            • Apr 2006
            • 3146

            #6
            Re: My take on BF1943

            Originally posted by Minmaster
            although i'm curious to see how many shots it will take to destroy buildings.
            (my game is still downloading) if it is anything like bad company then one shot can take down one wall, but that is with modern tanks so maybe different with 1943.

            Comment

            • Minmaster
              I DON'T PLAY CS!
              • Nov 2006
              • 4112

              #7
              Re: My take on BF1943

              yea that's bad news for infantry then. i mean, there are so many times in the old BF games i've survived against a tank by entering some building and hiding in there but looks like those days are over.

              Comment

              • Kylee!
                Member
                • Apr 2007
                • 4161

                #8
                Re: My take on BF1943

                Originally posted by Minmaster
                hmm then if some guy decides to get in a tank and just go around blowing up buildings down to the foundation in the beginning of the game, there won't be buildings to use for cover for infantry until the game ends?

                it sounds like tanks will be very powerful since infantry relies on cover which can be easily destroyed by them. although i'm curious to see how many shots it will take to destroy buildings.
                :|:

                It really doesn't work that way, the way the game is played thats not an issue at all.

                There aren't even that many buildings in the first place.

                Comment

                • imported_goya
                  Member
                  • Sep 2006
                  • 42

                  #9
                  Re: My take on BF1943

                  the limiting factor is the xbox 360, wait for the pc version i hope dice goes all out. with regards to battlefield series this is the best one so far. go back load bf42 and then lets talk about graphics, ect. this is better and only $15. hopefully it will take off and dice will offer map packs for additional $$$

                  Originally posted by Minmaster
                  yea that's bad news for infantry then. i mean, there are so many times in the old BF games i've survived against a tank by entering some building and hiding in there but looks like those days are over.

                  sorry charlie, did you try blowing up the ground, amazing, i even got the hole so deep that it filled with water, honestly try it yourself on wake.

                  Comment

                  • The_Eliminator
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 5486

                    #10
                    Re: My take on BF1943

                    Minmaster i have played hours of BC and i can promise you thats not a problem :)

                    There are still certain buildings that are indestructable :)

                    Comment

                    • iQue
                      Member
                      • May 2007
                      • 4925

                      #11
                      Re: My take on BF1943

                      Originally posted by goya
                      sorry charlie, did you try blowing up the ground, amazing, i even got the hole so deep that it filled with water, honestly try it yourself on wake.
                      Really? That would be pretty amazing, haha.

                      If you blow a hole in the sand at the beach, will the water from the ocean pour in? Damn I can't stand console FPS games but I want one just so I can test now :p

                      Comment

                      • Kylee!
                        Member
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 4161

                        #12
                        Re: My take on BF1943

                        Originally posted by iQue
                        Really? That would be pretty amazing, haha.

                        If you blow a hole in the sand at the beach, will the water from the ocean pour in? Damn I can't stand console FPS games but I want one just so I can test now :p
                        It seems the holes the air strikes make are the biggest ones... although I haven't tried shooting a tank shell into the beach yet.

                        brb. haha.

                        Comment

                        • spikeyperson
                          Member
                          • Jun 2005
                          • 63

                          #13
                          Re: My take on BF1943

                          Im hoping that 1943 is some kind of graphical testing ground for a fully blown 1942 sequel to be honest.
                          The 1943 gameplay is too stripped down for my liking, due to being a joint console game probably. The player limit is way too small and the game in general feels like a sad ghost of the original.

                          Comment

                          • stilla-killa
                            CantGetRight
                            • Aug 2005
                            • 5905

                            #14
                            Re: My take on BF1943

                            Originally posted by spikeyperson
                            Im hoping that 1943 is some kind of graphical testing ground for a fully blown 1942 sequel to be honest.
                            The 1943 gameplay is too stripped down for my liking, due to being a joint console game probably. The player limit is way too small and the game in general feels like a sad ghost of the original.
                            12 vs 12 feels more natural to me on these maps. You get to many people on one map, 32 and 64 players, and it is nothing but a cluster f**k. Plus with consoles they have to limit the player size. I am predicting that they will bring the player size up to 32 for the pc release.

                            Comment

                            • Kylee!
                              Member
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 4161

                              #15
                              Re: My take on BF1943

                              Originally posted by spikeyperson
                              Im hoping that 1943 is some kind of graphical testing ground for a fully blown 1942 sequel to be honest.
                              The 1943 gameplay is too stripped down for my liking, due to being a joint console game probably. The player limit is way too small and the game in general feels like a sad ghost of the original.
                              Yea the map size is fine for the amount of players. And you usually don't have to wait for vehicles or anything, they are just there.

                              Comment

                              Working...