64 players or bust?

[Minmaster]

let's see how the community feels about the possibility of 24 players only for BC2 on PC. if you don't agree, speak out let it be known you want something else. (64, 48, etc.)

[Deesies]

Re: 64 players or bust?

I usually only play on 32 player servers so I wouldn't be too bothered by that at least.

Though I admit I do not approve of Dice's apparant regression in game design and development the past couple of years.

[Hawkers]

Re: 64 players or bust?

I never play 64 player servers.

[Kylee!]

Re: 64 players or bust?

64 Players would be a necessity for the larger maps.

[jesus]

Re: 64 players or bust?

This is such a worthless poll because it doesn't matter what you prefer. A BF game should have a limit of 64 or more. There is no excuse.

I've said this over and over but can you not play with smaller numbers in BF2?

[USApatriot]

Re: 64 players or bust?

Honestly, I would like more than 64 players on larger maps with plenty of land, sea, and air vehicles properly balanced.

:cheers:

[iQue]

Re: 64 players or bust?

32 players, maybe up to 48 or so. I don't care for 64 player personally.

[imported_Dingdong]

Re: 64 players or bust?

i like 24.. although i wouldnt mind 32. If the amount of people gets to big i have a feeling servers will suck on xbox

[Minmaster]

Re: 64 players or bust?

i think 99.9% of my games have been on 64 man servers. i just love the chaos and bountiful targets to kill. to me, BF has always been about the chaos laid out over parts of expanse maps. if it's not 64 max, it's not battlefield for me. it's more like skirmish-field

[CptainCrunch]

Re: 64 players or bust?

Doesnt matter to me what size it is because I will be playing on 32 or less anyway.

Crunch

[imported_Tim]

Re: 64 players or bust?

Imma be PISSED if we keep getting 24 or 16 player ****... All the companies that originally focused on PC games are now putting most all their attention on friggen consoles! They're noting the fact that we're still out here but kinda shoving us away.

I hope they prove us wrong with BF:BC 2, give us 64 players, an Internet Browser for the dedicated PC Gaming communities out there, and give us a good variation of maps. PLEASE! Don't shut us out.

[golfisfun]

Re: 64 players or bust?

i think 99.9% of my games have been on 64 man servers. i just love the chaos and bountiful targets to kill. to me, BF has always been about the chaos laid out over parts of expanse maps. if it's not 64 max, it's not battlefield for me. it's more like skirmish-field

im with you. 64 or bust.

[=)BiT(= Evant3k]

Re: 64 players or bust?

I think 64 player servers in BF2 is a bust I try to avoid servers like this at all costs. No tactics involved just go support and spam nades...

[Deesies]

Re: 64 players or bust?

I think 64 player servers in BF2 is a bust I try to avoid servers like this at all costs. No tactics involved just go support and spam nades...

Sure if you're one of those people who play nothing but karkand infantry only.

[Mo0by]

Re: 64 players or bust?

64 player servers a generally chaos, no matter what map the combat becomes to condensed and there are no vehicles for most :rawr