Originally posted by Webs961
im kind of dissappointed
Collapse
X
-
Re: im kind of dissappointed
I'm happy to report that the HC filter is back in for the full retail version. :) -
Re: im kind of dissappointed
Originally posted by ch3ch3nhe s a friend of your s avatar
Lol good one.Leave a comment:
-
Re: im kind of dissappointed
Break out my precious Baur again
Leave a comment:
-
Re: im kind of dissappointed
Damn makes me wanna go reinstall it.Leave a comment:
-
Re: im kind of dissappointed
Yea i agree, 2142 for me was better than Bf2 or any online game i have played. Yes it had its problems and flaws, but it was awesome for teamwork.Leave a comment:
-
Re: im kind of dissappointed
and it was damn fun, 2142 was one of best games ive played, and defo the best sci-fi one :)Originally posted by KeyeliteGears of War was sci fi
Even in 2142, there was not that many laser guns (only the anti-tank battery, futuristic walker and hovercar were true sci-fi elements). Everyone seems to think, omfg sci fi = star wars lasers.. but most of the time that's not the case.Leave a comment:
-
Re: im kind of dissappointed
Gears of War was sci fiOriginally posted by The_EliminatorPeople knock sci-fi down for the futuristic laser weapons and such, but imo, if a sci-fi game was done really well, it would be a massive hit.
Even in 2142, there was not that many laser guns (only the anti-tank battery, futuristic walker and hovercar were true sci-fi elements). Everyone seems to think, omfg sci fi = star wars lasers.. but most of the time that's not the case.Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: im kind of dissappointed
I would much rather see a Vietnam CoD than a futuristic one, but thats just me.Originally posted by IwantcableI actually would have preferred another modern era game, but there are rumors that IW's next CoD game will be sci-fi.Leave a comment:
-
Re: im kind of dissappointed
You still didn't tell us who that was CheChen.Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: im kind of dissappointed
If the game doesnt leave you an impresion in the first 5-10 min then it s doomed. First impresion is olways important. When i started up the game it was 100% the same as cod4 the movement how the game feels it was just the same it dint brought any WOOOW this is some cool ****. It was like been ther done that. If you dint liked cod4 because it was moder time this is your best bet i guess. And i do think the reason they made this WW2 is because they thought they could win the souls of ppl that wher expecting cod4 to be WW2 game instead of modern. :salute:They said from the beginning it was WW2. They are going to do something different for CoD6, so in 2010, that may be what you are wanting. Until then, you have 2142 and CoD4. Personally, Im glad they did a nice WW2 one with some updated things in it. I havent played a WW2 is BF1942.
Wow, 5 whole minutes. Some people can tell if they like a game or not within a few minutes of playing. Good thing you tried it out and didnt waste your money.
Crunch
Originally posted by stilla-killaI still say that's the ugliest SOB I have ever seen in your avatar.Originally posted by The_EliminatorIm on to agree, who the hell is it???:|:
DONT HATE THE PLAYER HATE THE GAME :thumbsup:Leave a comment:
-
Re: im kind of dissappointed
Oh, thanks, didn't know that,Originally posted by CptainCrunchThere was a news article somewhere around here that IW already pushed it back to 2010.
Maybe it was rumor, but I recall seeing it somewhere. In any event, the next one is rumored to be "different" and may not even have the CoD name on it.
Crunch
I think it's great that it's been pushed back, I'm kinda tired of these games coming out every year.
I hope we get the new battlefield by around that time aswell.Leave a comment:
-
Re: im kind of dissappointed
Yeah, apparently it will focus in on the "war on terror" going on in Afghanistan in present day.
The problem is, that the fools running the show at EA are blaming Airborne's poor showing on the WWII setting, instead of all of the bugs/flaws and just plain unfinished state Airborne was in. If that is the case, then even if they make a modern war game, it could still be of mediocre-to-poor quality because they will not have learned their lessons and realized what they actually did wrong with Airborne.
With 3 poor MP games in a row now (Breakthrough, Pacific Assault, Airborne), even I think it's much safer to not expect anything good from their next one, but instead wait for official magazine reviews on the finished version, and/or playable demos before getting our hopes up. I won't say it will be an automatic fail, but I can no longer be optimistic about it either. All decisions should be based on the finished state of the game only, and even then, I'd be guarded about it.Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: im kind of dissappointed
Yeah PTO has yet to be fully exploited like ETO was. But COD6 is for sure not going to be ww2 so place all your bets if its going to be anywhere from Korea to 2###.Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: