Re: US Light Gunner Character.
Yep. One of my old clan-mates used to call them "duck men" as they were all hunched over and waddled around.
US Light Gunner Character.
Collapse
X
-
Re: US Light Gunner Character.
I don't mind the height or skinnier aspect of the character models as was mentioned above, it reminds me of MoH. TBH, the original CoD models always looked more like hobbits lol.Leave a comment:
-
Re: US Light Gunner Character.
For a soldier in WWII the uniform was everthing. give that Marine a helmet!!:salute:Leave a comment:
-
Re: US Light Gunner Character.
I have a real urge to sig that.Originally posted by [75AR]Cpl.PattonA helmet definitely belongs on his head,
I honestly feel that the developers left everything to the bare minimum they would get away with.Leave a comment:
-
Re: US Light Gunner Character.
A helmet definitely belongs on his head, especially due to it being in WWIILeave a comment:
-
Re: US Light Gunner Character.
The Marine Uniforms look kinda dumb imo. The Japanese are cool. The Germans are cool except they all have their sleeves rolled up. The Russians are alright, but they seem to be dressed a little warmer than they should be. I don't think that the whole Russian army ran around in trench coats in Germany.Leave a comment:
-
Re: US Light Gunner Character.
I think all the uniforms are messed up. The character who carries submachine guns shouldn't have a giant pack on his back. Also the camo is wrong. The U.S. Army used plain green. The USMC had a three-shade uniform called Green-side-out, they would switch sides and it would have the same effect but three-shade brown.
Almost like nowaday's woodland green camo and the US Army cookie desert camo.
I think the Japanese camo is good, I think the German camo is perfect. However the Russian camo stands out way too much. I don't know it it was like that though. If so I understand why they had so much trouble fighting the Germans. They fight as well fight in pink for that matter.Leave a comment:
-
Re: US Light Gunner Character.
ya cod2 = History Channel: The Game :oLeave a comment:
-
Re: US Light Gunner Character.
If you want a more historical COD then play COD2. :)Leave a comment:
-
Re: US Light Gunner Character.
It doesn't bother me, TBH. The guy could've lost his helmet while diving for cover somewhere.
In the big picture, COD:WW is not a history simulator, and from the dev perspective, this really is a minor issue that doesn't affect gameplay. Maybe they'll "fix" it eventually in a patch, but they really do have more important things to worry about for release.Leave a comment:
-
Re: US Light Gunner Character.
The "realism argument" never works...Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: US Light Gunner Character.
A marine could've picked up a Type 99 off a fallen Japanese soldier; it wouldn'tve been unheard of. Although, seeing a marine shooting at Japanese soldiers with an MP40 is a bit strange.Originally posted by WizrdwartsWho cares? The USMC weren't running around with SVT-40s and Type 99s in WWII either.Leave a comment:
-
Re: US Light Gunner Character.
Who cares? The USMC weren't running around with SVT-40s and Type 99s in WWII either.Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: US Light Gunner Character.
Its the developers, just check COD3 and those were the worst models ive seen in my life gaming. Lanky monkey skeletons that looked like they just came from planet Bean Stalk, and had goofy animations. Same thing present here except bad skinning.Leave a comment:
-
Re: US Light Gunner Character.
You have to get my vote here. I know the uniform became part of the soldier as their own body and there were strict regulations on wearing the complete uniform, but I also know that this was a type of rebellion by fighting men and the pacific theatre was a very hot and bloody warzone. Wouldnt he not be wearing his helmet for fear of heat exhaustion and/or losing it in the running/gunning of battle?
The japanese didnt have helmets but cloth caps. Of course metal was in short supply and the japanese died by staggering numbers, so maybe thats not the best argument
CrunchLeave a comment:
Leave a comment: