Flame On Soldier, Flame On

[Spawndemon]

<img src="http://images.totalgamingnetwork.com/potd/flameonsoldier.jpg" alt="Flame On Soldier, Flame On" border="0" />

[Kradath]

Re: Flame On Soldier, Flame On

I can't wait for this coop game, hopefully my friend won't set me on fire. :hmm:

[Kreepy Kitteh =^o.O^=]

Re: Flame On Soldier, Flame On

this game is going to be fcking EPIC!..

[Dan2k3k4]

Re: Flame On Soldier, Flame On

Will coop have FF on/off option? :lol: (though I guess it'd just be like playing normal SP, where it'll be like FF not tolerated: restart mission!) :o

[Piemaaan!]

Re: Flame On Soldier, Flame On

I always tried to TK without getting owned by the Restart.

It failed... So I joined BFE and just TK everyone there

[iPirate]

Re: Flame On Soldier, Flame On

BBQ time!

[MahouSniper]

Re: Flame On Soldier, Flame On

Eh, it looks awesome so far, but COD 3 sucked so I'm skeptical about this. Also, the WWII theater has been played to death. I just want Infinity Ward to rock COD5.:thumbsup:

[Kradath]

Re: Flame On Soldier, Flame On

Well, the pacific theater is nearly untouched.

[teetsaar123]

Re: Flame On Soldier, Flame On

I remember that there was a cheat in gta2 that allowed endless use of flamethrower...

[imported_Whiskey]

Re: Flame On Soldier, Flame On

Eh, it looks awesome so far, but COD 3 sucked so I'm skeptical about this.

If you read the early articles about COD:WW, Treyarch explained 2 major points: a) COD3 was made primarily with Console in mind (then discovered that it couldn't be transferred to PC), and b) they were rushed by Activision to get COD3 on the shelves.

From what we've been told at least so far, PC has had a large influence in the design of COD:WW, and they've had a full 2-yr development cycle.

Now, this does not guarantee a success, but from the vids and previews we've seen, plus the info above, IMO there's a lot of reason to be optimistic about COD:WW rather than pessimistic.

[imported_Will]

Re: Flame On Soldier, Flame On

If you read the early articles about COD:WW, Treyarch explained 2 major points: a) COD3 was made primarily with Console in mind (then discovered that it couldn't be transferred to PC), and b) they were rushed by Activision to get COD3 on the shelves.

From what we've been told at least so far, PC has had a large influence in the design of COD:WW, and they've had a full 2-yr development cycle.

Now, this does not guarantee a success, but from the vids and previews we've seen, plus the info above, IMO there's a lot of reason to be optimistic about COD:WW rather than pessimistic.

hmm well thatnks for the news....nvr really knew that


but im still a pessimist.

[M3D1C]

Re: Flame On Soldier, Flame On

Well, the pacific theater is nearly untouched.

FOr a good reason, the pacific front of WWII was horrible and to be quite frank, its not like grass is anyones favorite little piece of nature is it? Damn stuff just gets in the way.

[MahouSniper]

Re: Flame On Soldier, Flame On

IMO there's a lot of reason to be optimistic about COD:WW rather than pessimistic.

Au contraire, mon amie. If I'm pessimistic and it rocks, I feel :yay:

If I'm pessimistic and it sucks, I'm still :yay: because I was right.

...though that fire is purdy...