So...

[iQue]

... it's pretty cheap on steam, would you advise me to buy it? Looks pretty fun when looking at frag videos and stuff lol

I tried the demo but it was really short and it just... sucked (same with CoD4's demo). So I can't make up my mind from that.

Cheers

[Kylee!]

Re: So...

Sure why not?

Its harder than CoD4 though, and will take some getting used to.

[iQue]

Re: So...

Sure why not?

Its harder than CoD4 though, and will take some getting used to.

I already think CoD4 is a horribly dumbed down console-ish game... still fun to play though And I have pretty good aim so it's mainly a matter of getting used to it (I do great on CSS pubs as an example)

Anyone else that has some opinions?

[imported_Whiskey]

Re: So...

If you're going to buy a digital-distrubution copy of a game, then Steam is probably the best choice.

But just be aware, that whenever a game maker releases a patch, you have to wait until Steam converts it to their "format", and pushes that update out through their system...you can't use the "regular" disc-version of each patch. Steam is pretty good about doing this fairly promptly after each release, but some folks still had to wait a bit for each patch. For you, this is less important since this game has been out forever and no further updates will come out. This is more of a future FYI.

Anyway, COD2 still has a couple of thousand players each night at peak times, so the player base is still significant and much more than other games that have come out even this year.

[ch3ch3n]

Re: So...

if you wanna go back to ww2 weapons it s the best choise

[Foxx_36]

Re: So...

I feel like CoD4 was harder than CoD2.
The sniping on CoD2 was so easy, headshots left and right.
I recommend CoD2 highly, and I still can't decide if I like it or 4 more.
I play both frequently.