Start the Discussion on COD5

[imported_Whiskey]

Re: Start the Discussion on COD5

Err, isn't it console only?

Didn't actually read the news article, did ya?

[Kylee!]

Re: Start the Discussion on COD5

No lol...

*reads*

Edit: Wow! Thats freakin' awesome! Now I'm looking forward to this even more.

I never even saw the first page of this thread, haha.

[JoMaMaz]

Re: Start the Discussion on COD5

haha! Kudos for your honesty. :)

And yes, that was an AMAZING article for getting one pumped about this game. I'm excited to see the final product.

[Shiby]

Re: Start the Discussion on COD5

Good news, starting to get weary of cod4 hehe.

[EyeofG]

Re: Start the Discussion on COD5

If COD5 is like COD4, but with WW2 weapons and maps and a awesome single player, then it will be awesome.

[Kodakk]

Re: Start the Discussion on COD5

Sorry to burst your bubble, but it won't be (too) similar. It's got vehicles, which most likely means bigger maps, so the gameplay will probably be quite different.

[JoMaMaz]

Re: Start the Discussion on COD5

Different and better. :)

[TrudgiN]

Re: Start the Discussion on COD5

different and battlefield like, u want jeeps play a bf game i want infantry fighting on medium maps that's what cod is all about

[JoMaMaz]

Re: Start the Discussion on COD5

Wrong good sir, I dislike BF games. They're good for about a month and then get old, I'm an infantry person also. I'm not saying better b/c of the vehicles, I'm talking better b/c it is made by the people who made UO, the best cod. IW's cod's feel more stiff (as some people even said CoD2 was a step back from UO) whereas as Grey Matter (makers of CoDUO, Wolf: ET MP and now part of Treyarch) know how to make fun, team-oriented games, and that is why those two games I listed that they made are hugely successful mp games.

woot :)

[ManGuy]

Re: Start the Discussion on COD5

I'm getting this for console and pc, I was sold at the part where they said Pacific but all that other stuff this will equal or be better than COD 4 guaranteed, you can quote me on this. IW might end up being the one trying to keep a good name after this release.

[imported_Gunny]

Re: Start the Discussion on COD5

This maybe a dumb Q, But I will ask.
When they say there using the same Eng as CoD:4 does that mean the system requirements will be the same or very close?

[The_Eliminator]

Re: Start the Discussion on COD5

This maybe a dumb Q, But I will ask.
When they say there using the same Eng as CoD:4 does that mean the system requirements will be the same or very close?

I think it will depend on how far they push the engine itself, but i would imagine the minimum specs would be the same yes.

[JoMaMaz]

Re: Start the Discussion on COD5

I would also agree with The_Eliminator. They said they've enhanced the physics more and in different ways, but that would probably also mean you could just turn your physics settings off and it wouldn't affect your system. :)

[imported_Gunny]

Re: Start the Discussion on COD5

Enhanced physics? I gusse if you can run Airborne at high setting and R6V2 you should have no prob? but they don't want to shoot them self in the foot right, I have always found that the CoD's have been system friendly games.

[Needles]

Re: Start the Discussion on COD5

They are pretty system friendly, always able to turn them down and still enjoy them quite a bit.

My only beef with CoD games, and most shooters in general, is that camouflage doesn't really play that big of a role. For example, in Cod4, I can see a sniper in a bush all the way across the map in Creek. I would like for my Ghillie suit to make a difference compared to regular infantry suits. I absolutely love the sniping in all the CoD games, I just wish I were harder to spot. The only way people don't spot me is if I go prone, but then I can't see anything

I dunno, hopefully camouflage works a little better in CoD5 with some better graphics/more shadows..we will see.