Me and my friend get into this argument like once a week regarding the topic of unlocks (the G36E especially, which is the only gun he will ever use, and thinks its a gun that takes skill) VS the stock weaponry of BF2 (M16, AK-101, RPK, ect.)
He also doesn't call the weapons stock weapons, he calls them start weapons like this is some sort of RPG and my m16 or shotgun are the weapons your character starts with and his G36E is the end-game weapon for the medic (Yah, silly isnt it?) He believes that ALL unlocks are in every way,shape, and form better than the "Starting weapons" as if just cause you start with them makes them bad
So anyways, when we play we communicate heavily and we will exchange kits periodically when I pick up his kit to revive him, its a working technique and good teamwork but whenever he picks up my M16 he goes from getting kills to rarely getting a kill before dying again for me to revive him/him having to revive me.
He claims the guns like the M16 are the starting weapons and are awful and suck balls and so forth, and denies my claims that he sucks with any gun except the G36E. Which he does, whenever he gets the glitch where you cant use your unlocks he 9.9/10 ends the round with more deaths than kills and 90% of his teamwork is composed of revives. Whenever this happens I ask him why he doesn't use a different class and he goes on about whiny explanation why the other classes aren't worth his time, ect..
He also claims that the m16 is just horribly inaccurate and awful (I disagree there, as I average about 8 or more kills a round than him)
So I figure I would get a second opinion here. Who is right here, me who can play good with ANY Kit (his medic with the g36E included) or him who cannot use a single gun better than average except the G36E?
He also doesn't call the weapons stock weapons, he calls them start weapons like this is some sort of RPG and my m16 or shotgun are the weapons your character starts with and his G36E is the end-game weapon for the medic (Yah, silly isnt it?) He believes that ALL unlocks are in every way,shape, and form better than the "Starting weapons" as if just cause you start with them makes them bad
So anyways, when we play we communicate heavily and we will exchange kits periodically when I pick up his kit to revive him, its a working technique and good teamwork but whenever he picks up my M16 he goes from getting kills to rarely getting a kill before dying again for me to revive him/him having to revive me.
He claims the guns like the M16 are the starting weapons and are awful and suck balls and so forth, and denies my claims that he sucks with any gun except the G36E. Which he does, whenever he gets the glitch where you cant use your unlocks he 9.9/10 ends the round with more deaths than kills and 90% of his teamwork is composed of revives. Whenever this happens I ask him why he doesn't use a different class and he goes on about whiny explanation why the other classes aren't worth his time, ect..
He also claims that the m16 is just horribly inaccurate and awful (I disagree there, as I average about 8 or more kills a round than him)
So I figure I would get a second opinion here. Who is right here, me who can play good with ANY Kit (his medic with the g36E included) or him who cannot use a single gun better than average except the G36E?
Comment