What do you think of BF:H?

[jake_]

I loved TF2 tho found it to be a very fun game but weapon options were lacking and maps a little dull.

Didn't we already agree that the similarities to TF2 only extend as far as the cell-shading style?

[menace-uk-]

Didn't we already agree that the similarities to TF2 only extend as far as the cell-shading style?

Have any of you played BFH?? most likely not.

Any way i never said it was like TF2 did i?? No i was just trying to show that the art direction is not a problem for me since TF2 has a similar direction and was fun as hell.

Too many people around the web seem to be dismissing it because of it's cartoony art direction which is a shame cause done right this game could be great.

I just hope there is enough in there to keep veteran BF players engaged in the game:salute:

[reynolddog]

Didn't we already agree that the similarities to TF2 only extend as far as the cell-shading style?

I agree.

[Fusion]

looks fun, but i doubt that the graphics will be as good as TF2 and the ads will most certainly piss me off.

[=98=]

looks fun, but i doubt that the graphics will be as good as TF2 and the ads will most certainly piss me off.

There are no ads in the actual gameplay apparently, just on the opening menu.

And, seeing as it's free, i think you should put up with it

[seoulspirit]

ya know...looks are deceiving...
-:rofl:

[Salad Snake]

Didn't we already agree that the similarities to TF2 only extend as far as the cell-shading style?

And isn't that graphics style quite nice to look at?

It is for me anyway.

I'll put "ok" just for the fact I know squat about this game right now, but since they don't have to pay much attention to realism in this game, I feel as if that already gives them more of a chance to:

1. Have a very balanced class/customization structure.

2. Introduce a lot of neat items/weapons/abilities.

3. Have more enjoyable gameplay, unencumbered by realism expectations.

TF2 would have failed if they had shot for realism. Instead, they choose to forgo it and came out with a very polished game.

Hopefully Battlefield:Heroes can do the same.

[Idaeus]

Looks like it could be fun but I don't think I'll be a hardcore player of this game since its supposed to be "less strategic and advanced than Bf2". Sounds to me like they are trying to become what CS is today huh? Its free and simple, all kids will want to play it.

[seoulspirit]

*you know, there was so news on a medic-type-class
:shakehead

[jake_]

And isn't that graphics style quite nice to look at?

It is for me anyway.

I'll put "ok" just for the fact I know squat about this game right now, but since they don't have to pay much attention to realism in this game, I feel as if that already gives them more of a chance to:

1. Have a very balanced class/customization structure.

2. Introduce a lot of neat items/weapons/abilities.

3. Have more enjoyable gameplay, unencumbered by realism expectations.

TF2 would have failed if they had shot for realism. Instead, they choose to forgo it and came out with a very polished game.

Hopefully Battlefield:Heroes can do the same.

I think one of the biggest things that might make Heroes successful is the price.

Unless it's completely awfully, which probably won't be the case.

[Guest]

Well, it is free, so I can't really say I will be pissed if it is bad... because I didn't pay for it!

[seoulspirit]

but, it might spend valuable time out of your valuable life good cherni

[Iwantcable]

CKMC voted lol.

[Salad Snake]

CKMC voted lol.

He's still here?!?


:salute: to him.

[=sds=god]

Look, finally EA decided that their gaming community has spent enough on CRAP games, and decided to release a FREE crap-*** game.
TF2 wanna be. Free or not, its a joke!
But at the old saying goes, " You get what you pay for!!"