Battlefield 3

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Minmaster
    I DON'T PLAY CS!
    • Nov 2006
    • 4112

    #31
    well we're gonna hear something soon. the original news from october said they will announce it in january.

    "The new engine will be expanding on the current frostbite one (exploding buildings and long view distances.)"

    is this a good idea? don't we agree that the current engine has some serious problems and there are same bugs from 1942 that we still have in 2142? i was hoping it was a completely re-written engine from the ground up but it looks like it's just gonna be the current engine on steroids or something.

    from PC gamer:

    Our Spies tell us we'll soon see the announcement of Battlefield 3. This is great for fans of online shooting, long distance sniping, helicopter strafing and comedy tank antics. EA are tight-lipped for now, but here's what to expect.

    Modern Combat
    The biggest question: when and where will it be set? We hear it's going to be modern-day, in a fictional war between NATO and the Middle Eastern coalition [MEC]. Consider the last game - a future of floating artillery and anti-grav platforms - a diversion. Most of the eight maps will focus on urban sites. We'd love to see a return of Strike at Karkand - a frenzied battle across an empty city.

    More Online
    Since Battlefield 2, the team at DICE have picked up influence from MMO game. Persistent stat tracking and new weapons for experienced players will be present, but we're hoping for more. Expect to customize your soldier's appearance, armour, and weaponry beyond unlocks. Choosing a face, voice, tattoos, and badges would be an obvious start.

    Heavy Tech
    In console land, they're already being treated to a new Battlefield game, Subtitled Bad Company, it's debut of the next-gen "Frostbite" engine. Aside from producing staggering draw distance that lets you pick off targets miles away, it's imbued with some serious deformation technology. Buildings can be blown apart, bridges burst and craters carved. Battlefield 3 will evolve that technology further.

    Class Act
    Why mess with a near perfect set of abilities? Battlefield 3 won't alter the standard Sniper, Assault, Medic, Engineer, and Support class balance. Want a quick rev? Call for a Medic. Need a tank busted? Grab the Assault trooper and pray he's packed an RPG launcher.

    Guns, And More Guns
    Every soldier needs a weapon, and Battlefield 3 will be chock full of firearms, 34 in fact, split evenly between the MEC and NATO. You'll have to work for the privilege of sporting the most powerful rifles. As well as weapons, you'll unlock armour, ammo, helmets and accessories.

    Play Together
    The best feature of Battlefield 2. Sharing objectives and voice chat with friends as five-man squads. That's being extended, with squads able to join up to form a battalion - the perfect partner for improved clan support and ranked servers. Commanders can still order grunts to the front and supply them with ammo drops, radar pings, UAV reconnaissance and the occasional artillery strike.

    ~Tim Edwards

    Comment

    • =98=
      Member
      • Oct 2006
      • 10299

      #32
      I suspect we will hear soon, and see release at a similar time to BF2, late June just before everyone gets off school.

      I'm a little worried about all this sudden news. I just really hope it isn't a console port. I mean, they can work, CoD4 being an example of a well done port, but other games such as Gears of War and even Pro Evo 8 leave a lot to be desired.

      Comment

      • MrChris_CJ
        Mudkips
        • Jul 2005
        • 2610

        #33
        I don't reckon it will be a port tbh, while it is entirely within EA's gayness to do so, I think the lack of any official news shows that they want to keep it totally under wraps while they have spouted Bad Company as a potential console success

        what works on a console doesnt always work on a pc like you say Alex, the thing with EA/Dice is that they know what makes a Battlefield game good they just never seem able to perfectly implement it

        I just pray they havent turned it into some BS IO fragfest

        Comment

        • Stigmata

          #34
          is anyone actually sure that BF3 is simply not just Bad Company? Why would you release 2 BF games so close to each other? thats a very bad idea if you ask me...

          Comment

          • =98=
            Member
            • Oct 2006
            • 10299

            #35
            Because they are on completely different platforms. They both use the Frostbite engine and probably similar models so it makes sense to release them at the same time.

            Comment

            • Minmaster
              I DON'T PLAY CS!
              • Nov 2006
              • 4112

              #36
              exactly, it's not that much more work from bad company and implementing all the stuff they already have to make a new BF game. they are being very resourceful, they probably don't want to let everything from bad company go to waste when it can be put to use for them to make quick money.

              Comment

              • =98=
                Member
                • Oct 2006
                • 10299

                #37
                The cost of launching an advertising campaign covering both fronts would be less. The hype built up by one game would inevitably lead to people investigating the PC version or vica versa.

                If they were done separately, the hype builds up after advertising, it then dies down and it all has to be repeated for the next game.

                That cost's monie$

                Comment

                Working...