Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IO Karkand or IO Warlord?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by 9ff View Post
    BS
    its the place where u can see the difference between boys and men!
    uhh yeah if you mean the boys staying back nade spaming and reviving people for the points then yes it does seperate the boys from the men.

    Comment


    • #32
      WARLORD all the way!!!!! Zipline and Grapling hook haven. Nice sniper map in IO mode.

      Comment


      • #33
        Karkand . just coz its a great map . exspet when ppl are just nadn over the bildings at beging of the map :cry:

        Comment


        • #34
          and in warlord the only place where a Nade fest could really occur is the Palace and that really would not make a diffrence because its not like you can get tanks inside the walls.

          Comment


          • #35
            karkand cause i know it so very well

            although nade spam is like hell

            Comment


            • #36
              Just finished playing on it and damn did I ever have the worst team ever. My squad and I would cap a whole bunch of flags and move on to get others, and the team could just not hold it :|

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Gen.Vlade View Post
                I was playing Surge last week on a IO server and it was so stupid to run across that huge map full with hills without a vehicle. IO makes sense on very few maps, but I will always prefer maps with vehicles. My AT mines are useless against infantry.
                I love that map IO. Wish it was running more often.

                Wouldn't happen to know what server it was, do you?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Definitely Warlord. There is more opportunity to break out for the SAS and there is no grenade "funnel" on the map like the area around the Hotel in Karkand.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I think both maps have their sides.
                    Karkand: great map, nading at Hotel sucks big time sniper battle at the bridge can be fun if you like it.
                    Warlord: great map, clays and campers on the TV station flag suck big time, palace battle can be fun if you like it.

                    I'm currently trying to get my expert medic combat specialist at warlord IO and there are good rounds and bad ones. So, as I always say, it's not the game/map/mode that sucks - it's the ppl that play it ;-)

                    FipZ

                    FipZ

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Chael
                      Hate the train bridge battle. Always caused by some idiot who thinks it's a good idea to blow the bridge. If I see any one of you put c4 on that bridge I'll tk you where you stand.
                      Heh. I hate that too. I'm usually one of the only guys who ends up spawning as an engineer just to repair the bridge.

                      Although blowing up the bridge helps in a vehicle Karkand game, if you already have all the back bases. You can mine or C4 the other way up the hill and force any tanks to drive through, because they can't use the bridge.

                      But blowing up the bridge in an IO game is just completely useless.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Warlord because it is more detailed but Karkand is always a classic

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X