Does my graphics suck?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sike
    replied
    Re: Does my graphics suck?

    i have all medium no AA or dyamics.

    Leave a comment:


  • DesertFalcon
    replied
    Re: Does my graphics suck?

    I have all mine set to low with AA off. So you have alot better gfx then me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Drunken_x_Boxer
    Guest replied
    Re: Does my graphics suck?

    Is dis a good graph fix? :laugh:



    These are the setting I usually use. Mostly medium with a few set to high with 2AA and 4AF. I usually use 1280x1024 though. Not sure why this was 1024x768.



    Leave a comment:


  • =98=
    replied
    Re: Does my graphics suck?

    All high @ 1280 x 1024 with 8x AA.





    Leave a comment:


  • Bloodsport
    Guest replied
    Re: Does my graphics suck?

    This is mine running at 1280x1024. All settings on max and 4X AA. Not sure if I could put the AA up to remove some of the jagged edges, it might have a large impact on my fps. Card is 7900GTX 512. They are slightly scaled down as I can't find a free host that's good for images over 2MB.



    Leave a comment:


  • *FMJ*Power
    replied
    Re: Does my graphics suck?

    Originally posted by Chris_Redfield
    An on topic question. Power has thrown a lot of "choose native reso" around, what does it mean and how is it useful? Native as in, same reso as the screen has at the moment (not being in game)?

    At the moment, Im running 1280X800 on a laptops LCD screen. The settings in BF2 are standard 800X600 and 1024X768 only. Would it be useful for me to try to tweak some con files, or? I dont really have a problem with perfomance. All on MED/HI, but Im not using AA as Ive found a good medium between perf/eyecandy.
    when i say native resolution, all lcds have a resolution they are designed for, one that works best (this can usually be found with a Google search for the model number) its usually the highest resolution you can set the screen to but not always. you want to make sure you using this resolution as a base, then make your eye candy adjustments accordingly.

    depending on your video cards and lcd's native you might have to significantly lower the eye candy because the screens native is very high, like 1600x1200 for instance. for others this could mean the opposite but its always best to make sure your resolution is set to the screens native (crt tube owners can pretty much ignore all of this , this a lcd only thing) this way your getting the crispest picture your lcd was designed for then adjusting eye candy and AA based around that.

    Leave a comment:


  • camper.
    replied
    Re: Does my graphics suck?

    Originally posted by Chris_Redfield
    An on topic question. Power has thrown a lot of "choose native reso" around, what does it mean and how is it useful? Native as in, same reso as the screen has at the moment (not being in game)?

    At the moment, Im running 1280X800 on a laptops LCD screen. The settings in BF2 are standard 800X600 and 1024X768 only. Would it be useful for me to try to tweak some con files, or? I dont really have a problem with perfomance. All on MED/HI, but Im not using AA as Ive found a good medium between perf/eyecandy.
    Native resolution = the resolution the screen works best at, basically 1 pixel per whatever the DPI rating. Otherwise the screen has to scale it and you get slight blurring or other distortion.

    It's also a cheap way of getting anti-aliasing, if you do it right (by setting a distorted resolution so the screen has to resample it).

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris_Redfield
    replied
    Re: Does my graphics suck?

    An on topic question. Power has thrown a lot of "choose native reso" around, what does it mean and how is it useful? Native as in, same reso as the screen has at the moment (not being in game)?

    At the moment, Im running 1280X800 on a laptops LCD screen. The settings in BF2 are standard 800X600 and 1024X768 only. Would it be useful for me to try to tweak some con files, or? I dont really have a problem with perfomance. All on MED/HI, but Im not using AA as Ive found a good medium between perf/eyecandy.

    Leave a comment:


  • camper.
    replied
    Re: Does my graphics suck?

    Originally posted by kmak60
    I run 1650X1028 with 4AA, everything maxed except for textures (set to medium), and I usually have 30-40FPS with my 7900GS

    That might seem laggy to someone who's used to 150, such as yourself
    It really is physically laggy. Put down the AA to 2x and put the Textures up, 4xAA does take a large hit on performance.

    But going from 200fps (high in the sky) to 50-60 (going to bomb) makes me cringe, absolutely horrid.

    Does anyone else find their PC crawls to a halt when looking at a sniper?

    Leave a comment:


  • *FMJ*Power
    replied
    Re: Does my graphics suck?

    Originally posted by kmak60
    Probably banned for that.

    She was annoying anyways.
    ohhh i missed that one, the ninja must of swept that up on his wayout......heheheheh

    Leave a comment:


  • kmak60
    Guest replied
    Re: Does my graphics suck?

    Originally posted by KatieWolf
    however, you stupid little smartass fat mouth with little christian attitude about forgiving other people caused him to look like a jackass for even coming here for support. And because of that, I want you to look stupid like a joker in the garbage can instead of the TC.
    Probably banned for that.

    She was annoying anyways. Always funny getting insulted in broken english though

    Leave a comment:


  • Bziani
    Guest replied
    Re: Does my graphics suck?

    It's pretty good but try resulution on 1280x1024 or Anti-Aliasing bit higer.

    Leave a comment:


  • *FMJ*Power
    replied
    Re: Does my graphics suck?

    ....ouch....ninja ban stick just swung through here.......













    Originally posted by kmak60
    I run 1650X1028 with 4AA, everything maxed except for textures (set to medium), and I usually have 30-40FPS with my 7900GS

    That might seem laggy to someone who's used to 150, such as yourself


    thats very good. i just always try to tell people from a conservative point trying to keep the best fps, i just see too many people cranking eye candy but sacrificing crucial fps, that dynamic lighting and shadows are hog but im not saying turn it all off, theres nothing worse than someone with a great system running on the lowest settings in order to see the enemy better, just know your limits.

    Leave a comment:


  • kmak60
    Guest replied
    Re: Does my graphics suck?

    Originally posted by *FMJ*Power
    a nvidia is a nvidia, the gpus are all the same, manufacture doesn't really matter, they all come from the same die set, same thing with ati. as for the 2x aa and all maxed it really depends on the resolution. i would say proboly not for anything more than 1280x1024 and you may want to turn the dynamic lighting and shadows to low too just to preserver good fps.
    I run 1650X1028 with 4AA, everything maxed except for textures (set to medium), and I usually have 30-40FPS with my 7900GS

    That might seem laggy to someone who's used to 150, such as yourself

    Leave a comment:


  • *FMJ*Power
    replied
    Re: Does my graphics suck?

    a nvidia is a nvidia, the gpus are all the same, manufacture doesn't really matter, they all come from the same die set, same thing with ati. as for the 2x aa and all maxed it really depends on the resolution. i would say proboly not for anything more than 1280x1024 and you may want to turn the dynamic lighting and shadows to low too just to preserver good fps.

    Leave a comment:

Working...